Compare Stocks › ADBE vs MDT

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) vs Medtronic plc (MDT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ADBE is undervalued at $250, with a DCF intrinsic value of $560 and a margin of safety of 55%. MDT is overvalued at $97, with an intrinsic value of $80 and a margin of safety of -20%. Of the two, ADBE has the wider margin of safety.

ADBE
Adobe Inc.
$250.23
VS
MDT
Medtronic plc
$96.54

Rewards

ADBE
  • ★Adobe Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 89.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Adobe Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
MDT
  • ★Gross margin of 65.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.25 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADBE
MDT
Valuation
$9.35B
Free Cash Flow
$5.41B
9.60%
FCF Yield
4.38%
13.97
Trailing P/E
23.72
9.10
Forward P/E
15.07
Quality & Moat
38.51%
ROIC
7.26%
61.90%
ROE
10.65%
89.25%
Gross Margin
65.27%
0.60
PEG Ratio
1.73
Balance Sheet Safety
0.10
Net Debt / Equity
0.38
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.12
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.86
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.98%
ADBE: 10Ties: 1MDT: 1
ADBEMDT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADBE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MDT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADBE
$-0.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$18.12B
Δ Market Cap
$-10.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MDT
$6.22
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.25B
Δ Market Cap
+$13.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADBE
55.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 55.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $250.23
Fair Value: $559.54
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MDT
20.4% Overvalued
Price is 20.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $96.54
Fair Value: $80.20
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADBE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $250?

+1.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -1.1%

The market implies +1.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MDT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $97?

+10.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.5%

The market implies +10.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADBE
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MDT
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADBE
-2.85
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MDT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADBE
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.0%Retail & Other 10.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,955
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MDT
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 88.8%Retail & Other 10.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,955
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADBE
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.95M
RICKS DAVID A
Director
$1.95M
@ $194.51 · 2026-06-25
DURN DANIEL JAMES
Chief Financial Officer
$507,758
@ $390.58 · 2025-03-20
RICKS DAVID A
Director
$998,946
@ $443.98 · 2025-01-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MDT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
JELLISON WILLIAM R
Director
$462,750
@ $92.55 · 2025-08-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADBE
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.11M
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$109,961
@ $264.33 · 2026-07-29
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$185,915
@ $246.25 · 2026-04-30
DURN DANIEL JAMES
Chief Financial Officer
$331,355
@ $248.02 · 2026-04-20
DURN DANIEL JAMES
Chief Financial Officer
$485,323
@ $294.85 · 2026-01-27
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$50,344
@ $337.88 · 2025-10-31
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$175,828
@ $380.58 · 2025-05-02
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$145,567
@ $435.83 · 2025-01-28
BELSKY SCOTT K
Officer
$2.05M
@ $431.61 · 2025-01-27
BANSE AMY L
Director
$333,300
@ $550.00 · 2024-12-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MDT
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.92M
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$138,883
@ $93.65 · 2026-09-16
WALTER MATTHEW R.
Officer
$257,931
@ $83.15 · 2026-07-08
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$336,965
@ $80.44 · 2026-06-08
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$5.13M
@ $97.71 · 2026-02-19
SMITH GREGORY L
Officer
$3.06M
@ $101.95 · 2025-11-19
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$788,048
@ $91.58 · 2025-09-03
WALL BRETT A
Officer
$1.12M
@ $90.00 · 2025-01-24
WALL BRETT A
Officer
$792,038
@ $80.41 · 2025-01-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADBE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MDT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADBE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
MDT
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View ADBE Full AnalysisView MDT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADBE vs MDT

Is Adobe Inc. or Medtronic plc more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ADBE trades at a 55.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $560 vs. price $250), compared to MDT's -20.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $80 vs. $97).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Adobe Inc. or Medtronic plc?▼

ADBE scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while MDT scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Adobe Inc. or Medtronic plc?▼

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) generates a 9.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Medtronic plc's 4.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Adobe Inc. or Medtronic plc?▼

ADBE earns 38.5% ROIC versus MDT's 7.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

ADBE vs MDT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io