Compare StocksADBE vs FANG

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG)

ADBE
Adobe Inc.
$250.71
VS
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$207.65

Rewards

ADBE
  • Adobe Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 89.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Adobe Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
FANG
  • Gross margin of 73.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

ADBE
    FANG
    • ROIC has declined by 16.6 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Diamondback Energy, Inc. scores only 14/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    FANG
    Valuation
    $9.32B
    Free Cash Flow
    $497.62M
    9.20%
    FCF Yield
    0.85%
    14.62
    Trailing P/E
    36.24
    9.48
    Forward P/E
    12.09
    Quality & Moat
    41.36%
    ROIC
    -16.99%
    62.36%
    ROE
    3.87%
    89.40%
    Gross Margin
    73.04%
    1.32
    PEG Ratio
    55.52
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.58
    Debt / Equity
    0.34
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.02
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.41
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.02%
    ADBE: 9Ties: 1FANG: 1
    ADBEFANG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ADBE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    FANG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    $-0.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $18.12B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-10.93B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    FANG
    $4.58
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$18.18B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    50.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 50.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $250.71
    Fair Value: $501.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    FANG
    428.1% Overvalued
    Price is 428.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $207.65
    Fair Value: $39.32
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ADBE

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $251?

    +3.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -0.7%

    The market implies +3.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    FANG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $208?

    +18.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +35.4%

    The market implies +18.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +35.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    FANG
    14/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    -2.85
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    FANG
    -2.99
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 87.7%Retail & Other 12.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,316
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    FANG
    Insiders 30.6%Institutions 65.4%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,513
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    DURN DANIEL J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $507,758
    @ $390.58 · 2025-03-20
    RICKS DAVID A
    Director
    $998,946
    @ $443.98 · 2025-01-28
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    FANG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    TSURU FRANK D
    Director
    $313,020
    @ $156.51 · 2025-02-28
    WEST STEVEN E
    Director
    $975,960
    @ $162.66 · 2024-12-16
    REEVES ROBERT K
    Director
    $509,760
    @ $180.00 · 2024-11-08
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    2
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.05M
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $185,915
    @ $246.25 · 2026-04-30
    DURN DANIEL J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $331,355
    @ $248.02 · 2026-04-20
    DURN DANIEL J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $485,323
    @ $294.85 · 2026-01-27
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $50,344
    @ $337.88 · 2025-10-31
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $175,828
    @ $380.58 · 2025-05-02
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $145,567
    @ $435.83 · 2025-01-28
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $431.61 · 2025-01-27
    BANSE AMY L
    Director
    $333,300
    @ $550.00 · 2024-12-06
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $327,987
    @ $485.19 · 2024-10-29
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $232,525
    @ $483.42 · 2024-10-25
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $511.48 · 2024-10-16
    DURN DANIEL J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.35M
    @ $515.44 · 2024-09-17
    GARFIELD MARK S.
    Officer
    $52,089
    @ $537.00 · 2024-07-25
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $258,297
    @ $537.00 · 2024-07-25
    GARFIELD MARK S.
    Officer
    $85,255
    @ $564.60 · 2024-07-16
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $561.60 · 2024-07-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    FANG
    15
    Sells (3M)
    23
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.99B
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $965,000
    @ $193.00 · 2026-03-20
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $959,776
    @ $191.96 · 2026-03-20
    WEST STEVEN E
    Director
    $1.13M
    @ $188.35 · 2026-03-18
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $950,000
    @ $190.00 · 2026-03-18
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $781,293
    @ $190.51 · 2026-03-18
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $136,851
    @ $182.47 · 2026-03-16
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $3.76M
    @ $180.00 · 2026-03-13
    BARKMANN ALBERT
    Officer
    $731,600
    @ $182.90 · 2026-03-13
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $2.15B
    @ $170.19 · 2026-03-12
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $183.07 · 2026-03-09
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $180.84 · 2026-03-06
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.62M
    @ $181.11 · 2026-03-06
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $136,260
    @ $181.68 · 2026-03-06
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $176.71M
    @ $176.71 · 2026-03-04
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $331.87M
    @ $165.94 · 2026-02-04
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $305.18M
    @ $152.59 · 2025-11-28
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $596,948
    @ $149.24 · 2025-11-26
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $518,630
    @ $148.18 · 2025-11-14
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $147,730
    @ $147.73 · 2025-11-11
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $140.61 · 2025-11-06
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $212,275
    @ $141.52 · 2025-06-09
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Officer
    $710,306
    @ $142.06 · 2025-06-03
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $1.43M
    @ $142.69 · 2025-05-12
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $653,928
    @ $163.48 · 2024-12-13
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $200.00 · 2024-08-09
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $9.91M
    @ $198.15 · 2024-08-08
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $778,760
    @ $194.69 · 2024-06-10
    BARKMANN ALBERT
    Officer
    $194,750
    @ $194.75 · 2024-06-10
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $197.14 · 2024-05-28
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $1.19M
    @ $198.15 · 2024-05-17
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $4.89M
    @ $195.69 · 2024-05-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    FANG
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(72/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    FANG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
    View ADBE Full AnalysisView FANG Full Analysis
    ADBE vs FANG: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io