Compare StocksADBE vs DECK

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) vs Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ADBE is undervalued at $250, with a DCF intrinsic value of $554 and a margin of safety of 55%. DECK is undervalued at $97, with an intrinsic value of $203 and a margin of safety of 52%. Of the two, ADBE has the wider margin of safety.

ADBE
Adobe Inc.
$250.41
VS
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
$96.88

Rewards

ADBE
  • Adobe Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 89.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Adobe Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
DECK
  • Deckers Outdoor Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Deckers Outdoor Corporation scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 34.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

ADBE
    DECK
    • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    DECK
    Valuation
    $9.22B
    Free Cash Flow
    $871.42M
    9.26%
    FCF Yield
    6.61%
    14.33
    Trailing P/E
    13.78
    9.11
    Forward P/E
    11.58
    Quality & Moat
    37.82%
    ROIC
    23.98%
    62.95%
    ROE
    42.56%
    89.40%
    Gross Margin
    57.80%
    0.68
    PEG Ratio
    1.19
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.13
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.15
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.85
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    ADBE: 7Ties: 2DECK: 3
    ADBEDECK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ADBE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    DECK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    $-0.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $18.12B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-10.93B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    DECK
    $-1.43
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $2.75B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-3.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    54.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 54.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $250.41
    Fair Value: $553.74
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    DECK
    52.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 52.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $96.88
    Fair Value: $203.50
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ADBE

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $250?

    +1.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -0.6%

    The market implies +1.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    DECK

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $97?

    +0.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +2.7%

    The market implies +0.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    DECK
    93/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    -2.85
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    DECK
    -2.77
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 87.8%Retail & Other 12.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,051
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    DECK
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 102.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,306
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.95M
    RICKS DAVID A
    Director
    $1.95M
    @ $194.51 · 2026-06-25
    DURN DANIEL JAMES
    Chief Financial Officer
    $507,758
    @ $390.58 · 2025-03-20
    RICKS DAVID A
    Director
    $998,946
    @ $443.98 · 2025-01-28
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    DECK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    DAVIS CINDY L
    Director
    $200,319
    @ $109.76 · 2025-06-06
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.05M
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $185,915
    @ $246.25 · 2026-04-30
    DURN DANIEL JAMES
    Chief Financial Officer
    $331,355
    @ $248.02 · 2026-04-20
    DURN DANIEL JAMES
    Chief Financial Officer
    $485,323
    @ $294.85 · 2026-01-27
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $50,344
    @ $337.88 · 2025-10-31
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $175,828
    @ $380.58 · 2025-05-02
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $145,567
    @ $435.83 · 2025-01-28
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $431.61 · 2025-01-27
    BANSE AMY L
    Director
    $333,300
    @ $550.00 · 2024-12-06
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $327,987
    @ $485.19 · 2024-10-29
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $232,525
    @ $483.42 · 2024-10-25
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $511.48 · 2024-10-16
    DURN DANIEL JAMES
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.35M
    @ $515.44 · 2024-09-17
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    DECK
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.20M
    SHANAHAN LAURI M.
    Director
    $537,681
    @ $114.84 · 2026-02-13
    SPANGENBERG ANNE
    Officer
    $471,389
    @ $116.02 · 2026-02-13
    SPRING-GREEN ROBIN
    Officer
    $39,482
    @ $113.78 · 2026-02-13
    OGBECHIE ANGELA
    Officer
    $118,910
    @ $81.45 · 2025-10-31
    IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
    Director
    $35,405
    @ $118.02 · 2025-09-08
    IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
    Director
    $32,723
    @ $109.08 · 2025-06-06
    OGBECHIE ANGELA
    Officer
    $648,675
    @ $103.89 · 2025-06-02
    IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
    Director
    $40,344
    @ $134.48 · 2025-03-06
    POWERS DAVID A
    Director
    $3.47M
    @ $138.84 · 2025-02-28
    STEFANO CAROTI
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.97M
    @ $208.34 · 2024-12-11
    IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
    Director
    $60,239
    @ $200.80 · 2024-12-06
    STEWART BONITA C
    Director
    $838,935
    @ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
    SPANGENBERG ANNE
    Officer
    $723,721
    @ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
    ELLERKER MARCO
    Officer
    $992,858
    @ $175.20 · 2024-11-20
    GARCIA THOMAS
    Officer
    $3.16M
    @ $175.28 · 2024-11-19
    STEFANO CAROTI
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $175.73 · 2024-11-19
    STEWART BONITA C
    Director
    $1.58M
    @ $175.42 · 2024-11-08
    FASCHING STEVEN J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $175.00 · 2024-11-08
    OGBECHIE ANGELA
    Officer
    $208,617
    @ $163.24 · 2024-10-31
    FASCHING STEVEN J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $166.67 · 2024-10-04
    POWERS DAVID A
    Director
    $3.38M
    @ $863.08 · 2024-09-06
    IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
    Director
    $43,253
    @ $865.06 · 2024-09-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    DECK
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    DECK
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    View ADBE Full AnalysisView DECK Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ADBE vs DECK

    Is Adobe Inc. or Deckers Outdoor Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ADBE trades at a 54.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $554 vs. price $250), compared to DECK's 52.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $203 vs. $97).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Adobe Inc. or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?

    ADBE scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while DECK scores 93/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Adobe Inc. or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?

    Adobe Inc. (ADBE) generates a 9.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Deckers Outdoor Corporation's 6.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Adobe Inc. or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?

    ADBE earns 37.8% ROIC versus DECK's 24.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.