Compare Stocks › ADBE vs DECK

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) vs Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ADBE is undervalued at $250, with a DCF intrinsic value of $560 and a margin of safety of 55%. DECK is undervalued at $82, with an intrinsic value of $151 and a margin of safety of 46%. Of the two, ADBE has the wider margin of safety.

ADBE
Adobe Inc.
$250.23
VS
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
$81.99

Rewards

ADBE
  • ★Adobe Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 89.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Adobe Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
DECK
  • ★Deckers Outdoor Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Deckers Outdoor Corporation scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 34.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADBE
DECK
Valuation
$9.35B
Free Cash Flow
$1.10B
9.60%
FCF Yield
10.03%
13.97
Trailing P/E
10.86
9.10
Forward P/E
10.02
Quality & Moat
38.51%
ROIC
40.50%
61.90%
ROE
44.27%
89.25%
Gross Margin
58.92%
0.60
PEG Ratio
0.97
Balance Sheet Safety
0.10
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.12
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.48
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
ADBE: 5Ties: 2DECK: 5
ADBEDECK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADBE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DECK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADBE
$-0.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$18.12B
Δ Market Cap
$-10.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DECK
$-2.19
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.75B
Δ Market Cap
$-6.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADBE
55.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 55.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $250.23
Fair Value: $559.54
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DECK
45.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 45.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $81.99
Fair Value: $151.35
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADBE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $250?

+1.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -1.1%

The market implies +1.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

DECK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $82?

-1.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.8%

The market implies -1.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADBE
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DECK
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADBE
-2.85
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DECK
-2.77
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADBE
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.0%Retail & Other 10.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,955
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DECK
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 104.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,319
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADBE
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.95M
RICKS DAVID A
Director
$1.95M
@ $194.51 · 2026-06-25
DURN DANIEL JAMES
Chief Financial Officer
$507,758
@ $390.58 · 2025-03-20
RICKS DAVID A
Director
$998,946
@ $443.98 · 2025-01-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DECK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
DAVIS CINDY L
Director
$200,319
@ $109.76 · 2025-06-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADBE
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.11M
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$109,961
@ $264.33 · 2026-07-29
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$185,915
@ $246.25 · 2026-04-30
DURN DANIEL JAMES
Chief Financial Officer
$331,355
@ $248.02 · 2026-04-20
DURN DANIEL JAMES
Chief Financial Officer
$485,323
@ $294.85 · 2026-01-27
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$50,344
@ $337.88 · 2025-10-31
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$175,828
@ $380.58 · 2025-05-02
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$145,567
@ $435.83 · 2025-01-28
BELSKY SCOTT K
Officer
$2.05M
@ $431.61 · 2025-01-27
BANSE AMY L
Director
$333,300
@ $550.00 · 2024-12-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DECK
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.05M
SPANGENBERG ANNE
Officer
$471,389
@ $116.02 · 2026-02-13
SPRING-GREEN ROBIN
Officer
$39,482
@ $113.78 · 2026-02-13
SHANAHAN LAURI M.
Director
$537,681
@ $114.84 · 2026-02-13
OGBECHIE ANGELA
Officer
$118,910
@ $81.45 · 2025-10-31
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$35,405
@ $118.02 · 2025-09-08
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$32,723
@ $109.08 · 2025-06-06
OGBECHIE ANGELA
Officer
$648,675
@ $103.89 · 2025-06-02
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$40,344
@ $134.48 · 2025-03-06
POWERS DAVID A
Director
$3.47M
@ $138.84 · 2025-02-28
STEFANO CAROTI
Chief Executive Officer
$2.97M
@ $208.34 · 2024-12-11
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$60,239
@ $200.80 · 2024-12-06
SPANGENBERG ANNE
Officer
$723,721
@ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
STEWART BONITA C
Director
$838,935
@ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
ELLERKER MARCO
Officer
$992,858
@ $175.20 · 2024-11-20
GARCIA THOMAS
Officer
$3.16M
@ $175.28 · 2024-11-19
STEFANO CAROTI
Chief Executive Officer
$2.64M
@ $175.73 · 2024-11-19
FASCHING STEVEN J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.54M
@ $175.00 · 2024-11-08
STEWART BONITA C
Director
$1.58M
@ $175.42 · 2024-11-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADBE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DECK
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADBE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
DECK
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
View ADBE Full AnalysisView DECK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADBE vs DECK

Is Adobe Inc. or Deckers Outdoor Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ADBE trades at a 55.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $560 vs. price $250), compared to DECK's 45.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $151 vs. $82).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Adobe Inc. or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?▼

ADBE scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while DECK scores 93/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Adobe Inc. or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?▼

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) generates a 10.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Adobe Inc.'s 9.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Adobe Inc. or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?▼

DECK earns 40.5% ROIC versus ADBE's 38.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.