Compare StocksACN vs BAC

Accenture plc (ACN) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, ACN is undervalued at $128, with a DCF intrinsic value of $281 and a margin of safety of 55%. BAC is undervalued at $56, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

ACN
Accenture plc
$127.98
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20

Rewards

ACN
  • Accenture plc has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Accenture plc scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ACN
  • 17 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ACN
BAC
Valuation
$12.14B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
15.50%
FCF Yield
N/A
10.22
Trailing P/E
13.95
8.66
Forward P/E
11.13
Quality & Moat
23.38%
ROIC
3.89%
24.41%
ROE
10.64%
32.01%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.90
PEG Ratio
1.00
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.14
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
5.09%
Dividend Yield
1.99%
ACN: 7Ties: 1BAC: 0
ACNBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ACN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ACN
$-0.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$12.05B
Δ Market Cap
$-1.58B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ACN
54.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 54.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $127.98
Fair Value: $281.49
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ACN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $128?

-3.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -8.6%

The market implies -3.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -8.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ACN
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ACN
-2.93
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ACN
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 85.6%Retail & Other 14.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,035
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ACN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ACN
1
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.61M
EGAWA ATSUSHI
Officer
$863,044
@ $177.14 · 2026-04-30
SWEET JULIE SPELLMAN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.46M
@ $241.23 · 2026-02-10
WALSH JOHN F
Officer
$3,389
@ $242.07 · 2026-02-04
SHARMA MANISH
Officer
$24,535
@ $250.36 · 2026-02-03
SWEET JULIE SPELLMAN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.33M
@ $242.39 · 2026-02-03
BURGUM MELISSA A
Officer
$3,756
@ $250.40 · 2026-02-03
WALSH JOHN F
Officer
$1.10M
@ $276.38 · 2026-01-27
CLIFFORD KATHERINE LEE
Officer
$220,985
@ $280.79 · 2026-01-26
HOGAN CATHERINE KIERNAN
Chief Operating Officer
$185,412
@ $280.93 · 2026-01-26
BURGUM MELISSA A
Officer
$1.01M
@ $281.01 · 2026-01-26
UNRUCH JOEL SCOTT
General Counsel
$289,024
@ $281.70 · 2026-01-23
CLIFFORD KATHERINE LEE
Officer
$191,108
@ $280.63 · 2026-01-20
MACCHI MAURO
Officer
$140,000
@ $280.00 · 2026-01-14
SHARMA MANISH
Officer
$786,871
@ $288.13 · 2026-01-14
SWEET JULIE SPELLMAN
Chief Executive Officer
$488,380
@ $288.30 · 2026-01-14
MACCHI MAURO
Officer
$140,000
@ $280.00 · 2026-01-07
UNRUCH JOEL SCOTT
General Counsel
$366,300
@ $275.00 · 2026-01-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ACN
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ACN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View ACN Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ACN vs BAC

Is Accenture plc or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to ACN's 54.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $281 vs. $128).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Accenture plc or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ACN scores 90/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ACN scores 5.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Accenture plc or Bank of America Corporation?

ACN earns 23.4% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Accenture plc's or Bank of America Corporation's?

ACN's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). ACN has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.