Compare StocksACGL vs INTU

Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ACGL is undervalued at $91, with a DCF intrinsic value of $265 and a margin of safety of 66%. INTU is undervalued at $267, with an intrinsic value of $536 and a margin of safety of 50%. Of the two, ACGL has the wider margin of safety.

ACGL
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
$91.18
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$267.00

Rewards

ACGL
  • Arch Capital Group Ltd. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 17.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.00 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

ACGL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.10 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
INTU
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ACGL
INTU
Valuation
$5.28B
Free Cash Flow
$5.23B
16.56%
FCF Yield
7.16%
7.01
Trailing P/E
16.30
9.22
Forward P/E
9.77
Quality & Moat
14.67%
ROIC
28.21%
21.31%
ROE
22.50%
39.37%
Gross Margin
80.79%
1.05
PEG Ratio
0.73
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.01
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.02
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.71%
ACGL: 5Ties: 2INTU: 5
ACGLINTU

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ACGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ACGL
$1.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.16B
Δ Market Cap
+$11.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ACGL
65.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 65.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $91.18
Fair Value: $264.65
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTU
50.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $267.00
Fair Value: $535.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ACGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $91?

-7.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -9.7%

The market implies -7.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -9.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $267?

+4.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.8%

The market implies +4.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ACGL
78/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ACGL
-2.46
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ACGL
Insiders 2.6%Institutions 94.9%Retail & Other 2.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,317
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 92.3%Retail & Other 5.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,820
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ACGL
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $498,650
HOUSTON DANIEL JOSEPH
Director
$498,650
@ $94.08 · 2026-04-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTU
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ACGL
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.94M
GANSBERG DAVID E
President
$569,266
@ $96.37 · 2026-03-10
PAPADOPOULO NICOLAS
Chief Executive Officer
$2.11M
@ $96.31 · 2026-03-10
RAJEH MAAMOUN
Officer
$4.56M
@ $96.12 · 2026-02-11
MORIN FRANCOIS
Chief Financial Officer
$756,996
@ $94.62 · 2025-11-28
RAJEH MAAMOUN
President
$941,464
@ $94.15 · 2025-08-22
MORIN FRANCOIS
Chief Financial Officer
$1.19M
@ $94.58 · 2025-05-16
PETRILLO LOUIS T
Officer
$1.57M
@ $94.53 · 2025-05-09
PAPADOPOULO NICOLAS
Chief Executive Officer
$706,177
@ $92.48 · 2025-05-02
PETRILLO LOUIS T
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$1.93M
@ $91.78 · 2025-03-05
MORIN FRANCOIS
Chief Financial Officer
$1.17M
@ $102.46 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTU
1
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.47M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$15.86M
@ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.06M
@ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$11.16M
@ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ACGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ACGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
View ACGL Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ACGL vs INTU

Is Arch Capital Group Ltd. or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ACGL trades at a 65.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $265 vs. price $91), compared to INTU's 50.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $536 vs. $267).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Arch Capital Group Ltd. or Intuit Inc.?

INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat), while ACGL scores 78/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Arch Capital Group Ltd. in financial distress?

ACGL's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 8.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Arch Capital Group Ltd. or Intuit Inc.?

Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) generates a 16.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Intuit Inc.'s 7.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Arch Capital Group Ltd. or Intuit Inc.?

INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus ACGL's 14.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Arch Capital Group Ltd.'s or Intuit Inc.'s?

INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ACGL's 85/100 (Very Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

ACGL vs INTU: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io