Compare StocksACGL vs BAC

Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ACGL is undervalued at $91, with a DCF intrinsic value of $265 and a margin of safety of 66%. BAC is undervalued at $56, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, ACGL has the wider margin of safety.

ACGL
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
$91.18
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20

Rewards

ACGL
  • Arch Capital Group Ltd. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 17.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.00 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ACGL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.10 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ACGL
BAC
Valuation
$5.28B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
16.56%
FCF Yield
N/A
7.01
Trailing P/E
13.95
9.22
Forward P/E
11.13
Quality & Moat
14.67%
ROIC
3.89%
21.31%
ROE
10.64%
39.37%
Gross Margin
0.00%
1.05
PEG Ratio
1.02
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.97%
ACGL: 5Ties: 2BAC: 1
ACGLBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ACGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ACGL
$1.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.16B
Δ Market Cap
+$11.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ACGL
65.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 65.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $91.18
Fair Value: $264.65
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ACGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $91?

-7.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -9.7%

The market implies -7.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -9.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ACGL
78/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ACGL
-2.46
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ACGL
Insiders 2.6%Institutions 94.9%Retail & Other 2.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,317
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ACGL
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $498,650
HOUSTON DANIEL JOSEPH
Director
$498,650
@ $94.08 · 2026-04-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ACGL
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.94M
GANSBERG DAVID E
President
$569,266
@ $96.37 · 2026-03-10
PAPADOPOULO NICOLAS
Chief Executive Officer
$2.11M
@ $96.31 · 2026-03-10
RAJEH MAAMOUN
Officer
$4.56M
@ $96.12 · 2026-02-11
MORIN FRANCOIS
Chief Financial Officer
$756,996
@ $94.62 · 2025-11-28
RAJEH MAAMOUN
President
$941,464
@ $94.15 · 2025-08-22
MORIN FRANCOIS
Chief Financial Officer
$1.19M
@ $94.58 · 2025-05-16
PETRILLO LOUIS T
Officer
$1.57M
@ $94.53 · 2025-05-09
PAPADOPOULO NICOLAS
Chief Executive Officer
$706,177
@ $92.48 · 2025-05-02
PETRILLO LOUIS T
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$1.93M
@ $91.78 · 2025-03-05
MORIN FRANCOIS
Chief Financial Officer
$1.17M
@ $102.46 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ACGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ACGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View ACGL Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ACGL vs BAC

Is Arch Capital Group Ltd. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ACGL trades at a 65.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $265 vs. price $91), compared to BAC's 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $133 vs. $56).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Arch Capital Group Ltd. or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ACGL scores 78/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ACGL scores 1.1 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Arch Capital Group Ltd. or Bank of America Corporation?

ACGL earns 14.7% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Arch Capital Group Ltd.'s or Bank of America Corporation's?

ACGL's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). ACGL has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

ACGL vs BAC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io