Compare StocksABT vs UNP

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs Union Pacific Corporation (UNP)

ABT
Abbott Laboratories
$107.19
VS
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
$234.18

Rewards

ABT
  • Abbott Laboratories scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.89 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Dividend yield of 2.35% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
UNP
  • Union Pacific Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Union Pacific Corporation scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

ABT
    UNP
    • PEG ratio of 2.87 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ABT
    UNP
    Valuation
    $6.29B
    Free Cash Flow
    $5.50B
    3.38%
    FCF Yield
    3.96%
    28.81
    Trailing P/E
    19.53
    17.18
    Forward P/E
    17.34
    Quality & Moat
    11.31%
    ROIC
    15.44%
    12.36%
    ROE
    38.65%
    56.66%
    Gross Margin
    56.35%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    2.87
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.27
    Debt / Equity
    1.78
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.43
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.52
    2.35%
    Dividend Yield
    2.36%
    ABT: 3Ties: 4UNP: 4
    ABTUNP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ABT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    UNP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ABT
    $1.89
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $14.14B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$26.79B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    UNP
    $0.98
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $10.64B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$10.42B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ABT
    20.8% Overvalued
    Price is 20.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $107.19
    Fair Value: $88.73
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    UNP
    6.5% Overvalued
    Price is 6.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $234.18
    Fair Value: $219.93
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ABT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $107?

    +12.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.4%

    The market implies +12.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    UNP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $234?

    +10.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.7%

    The market implies +10.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ABT
    74/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by margin stability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    UNP
    80/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by margin stability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ABT
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    UNP
    -2.62
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ABT
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 82.1%Retail & Other 17.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,093
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    UNP
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.0%Retail & Other 10.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,432
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ABT
    2
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.10M
    STARKS DANIEL J
    Director
    $1.09M
    @ $108.73 · 2026-02-04
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $107.13 · 2026-01-23
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    UNP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ABT
    6
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.77M
    SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
    Officer
    $102,288
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $67,614
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MORRONE LOUIS H
    Officer
    $132,224
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $81,946
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    CUSHMAN ELIZABETH C
    General Counsel
    $30,398
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MORELAND MARY K
    Officer
    $70,851
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $203,043
    @ $128.02 · 2025-11-25
    BOUDREAU PHILIP P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $746,758
    @ $134.55 · 2025-08-08
    BLOUNT SALLY E
    Director
    $337,116
    @ $129.66 · 2025-04-30
    EARNHARDT LISA D
    President
    $12.23M
    @ $133.83 · 2025-03-07
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $77,652
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    WAINER ANDREA F
    Officer
    $131,123
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $77,652
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    MORELAND MARY K
    Officer
    $109,292
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    MORRONE LOUIS H
    Officer
    $153,507
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $37.44M
    @ $131.17 · 2025-02-05
    ALLEN HUBERT L.
    Officer
    $24.34M
    @ $128.26 · 2025-01-30
    SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
    Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $128.50 · 2025-01-30
    ALLEN HUBERT L.
    Officer
    $18.42M
    @ $117.04 · 2024-10-21
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.49M
    @ $116.41 · 2024-09-12
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $3,100
    @ $114.81 · 2024-09-04
    FUNCK ROBERT E. JR.
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $104.57 · 2024-05-10
    EARNHARDT LISA D
    Officer
    $2.43M
    @ $106.25 · 2024-05-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    UNP
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    RICHARDSON CRAIG V
    Officer
    $1.64M
    @ $252.00 · 2025-01-27
    WHITED ELIZABETH F.
    President
    $1.88M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-01-24
    WHITED ELIZABETH F.
    President
    $875,905
    @ $246.59 · 2024-07-30
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ABT
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(38/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    UNP
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(44/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ABT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
    UNP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
    View ABT Full AnalysisView UNP Full Analysis
    Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io