Compare StocksABT vs NEE

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE)

ABT
Abbott Laboratories
$107.19
VS
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
$92.41

Rewards

ABT
  • Abbott Laboratories scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.89 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Dividend yield of 2.35% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
NEE
  • Gross margin of 62.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

ABT
    NEE
    • NextEra Energy, Inc. scores only 24/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.13 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ABT
    NEE
    Valuation
    $6.29B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-15.21B
    3.38%
    FCF Yield
    -7.90%
    28.81
    Trailing P/E
    28.00
    17.18
    Forward P/E
    21.10
    Quality & Moat
    11.31%
    ROIC
    3.23%
    12.36%
    ROE
    10.28%
    56.66%
    Gross Margin
    62.27%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.27
    Debt / Equity
    1.46
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.43
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    6.68
    2.35%
    Dividend Yield
    2.70%
    ABT: 7Ties: 2NEE: 2
    ABTNEE

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ABT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    NEE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ABT
    $1.89
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $14.14B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$26.79B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    NEE
    $0.13
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $8.39B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.11B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ABT
    20.8% Overvalued
    Price is 20.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $107.19
    Fair Value: $88.73
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    NEE
    200.2% Overvalued
    Price is 200.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $92.41
    Fair Value: $30.78
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ABT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $107?

    +12.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.4%

    The market implies +12.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    NEE

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ABT
    74/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by margin stability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    NEE
    24/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ABT
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    NEE
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ABT
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 82.1%Retail & Other 17.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,093
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    NEE
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 15.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,718
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ABT
    2
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.10M
    STARKS DANIEL J
    Director
    $1.09M
    @ $108.73 · 2026-02-04
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $107.13 · 2026-01-23
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    NEE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ABT
    6
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.77M
    SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
    Officer
    $102,288
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $67,614
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MORRONE LOUIS H
    Officer
    $132,224
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $81,946
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    CUSHMAN ELIZABETH C
    General Counsel
    $30,398
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MORELAND MARY K
    Officer
    $70,851
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $203,043
    @ $128.02 · 2025-11-25
    BOUDREAU PHILIP P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $746,758
    @ $134.55 · 2025-08-08
    BLOUNT SALLY E
    Director
    $337,116
    @ $129.66 · 2025-04-30
    EARNHARDT LISA D
    President
    $12.23M
    @ $133.83 · 2025-03-07
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $77,652
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    WAINER ANDREA F
    Officer
    $131,123
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $77,652
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    MORELAND MARY K
    Officer
    $109,292
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    MORRONE LOUIS H
    Officer
    $153,507
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $37.44M
    @ $131.17 · 2025-02-05
    ALLEN HUBERT L.
    Officer
    $24.34M
    @ $128.26 · 2025-01-30
    SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
    Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $128.50 · 2025-01-30
    ALLEN HUBERT L.
    Officer
    $18.42M
    @ $117.04 · 2024-10-21
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.49M
    @ $116.41 · 2024-09-12
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $3,100
    @ $114.81 · 2024-09-04
    FUNCK ROBERT E. JR.
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $104.57 · 2024-05-10
    EARNHARDT LISA D
    Officer
    $2.43M
    @ $106.25 · 2024-05-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    NEE
    9
    Sells (3M)
    20
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $36.59M
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $458,862
    @ $93.00 · 2026-03-13
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $646,423
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $347,088
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    CREWS TERRELL KIRK II
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $482,505
    @ $95.00 · 2026-02-17
    KETCHUM JOHN W.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.90M
    @ $89.34 · 2026-02-09
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $2.70M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $920,210
    @ $85.00 · 2026-01-22
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $985,481
    @ $81.25 · 2025-12-11
    PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
    Director
    $12.18M
    @ $83.91 · 2025-11-17
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $906,880
    @ $80.00 · 2025-10-03
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $62,943
    @ $77.90 · 2025-10-01
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $63,365
    @ $74.90 · 2025-09-25
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $60,827
    @ $71.90 · 2025-09-12
    DUNNE MICHAEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $707,900
    @ $70.79 · 2025-09-08
    COFFEY ROBERT
    Officer
    $538,800
    @ $71.84 · 2025-07-28
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $168,718
    @ $77.50 · 2025-07-22
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $75.00 · 2025-05-16
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.66M
    @ $70.00 · 2025-05-09
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer
    $162,258
    @ $68.09 · 2025-02-18
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $302,809
    @ $75.57 · 2024-11-12
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $3.19M
    @ $85.00 · 2024-09-16
    PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $7.95M
    @ $80.00 · 2024-08-26
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $4.06M
    @ $78.55 · 2024-05-31
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ABT
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(38/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    NEE
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ABT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
    NEE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    View ABT Full AnalysisView NEE Full Analysis
    Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io