Compare StocksABT vs LMT

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ABT is overvalued at $106, with a DCF intrinsic value of $89 and a margin of safety of -18%. LMT is overvalued at $583, with an intrinsic value of $389 and a margin of safety of -50%. Of the two, ABT has the wider margin of safety.

ABT
Abbott Laboratories
$105.70
VS
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
$582.74

Rewards

ABT
  • Abbott Laboratories scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Altman Z-Score of 5.60 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
LMT
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

ABT
  • Trailing P/E of 34.2x is 26% above the historical average of 27.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.13 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
LMT
  • Gross margin of 11.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • High leverage (1.91x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABT
LMT
Valuation
$7.21B
Free Cash Flow
$5.56B
3.94%
FCF Yield
4.14%
34.21
Trailing P/E
21.50
17.43
Forward P/E
17.81
Quality & Moat
6.41%
ROIC
24.82%
10.58%
ROE
89.17%
56.85%
Gross Margin
11.80%
2.13
PEG Ratio
1.21
Balance Sheet Safety
0.52
Net Debt / Equity
1.91
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.32
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.73
2.38%
Dividend Yield
2.37%
ABT: 3Ties: 4LMT: 5
ABTLMT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LMT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABT
$1.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$14.14B
Δ Market Cap
+$26.79B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LMT
$-1.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$8.03B
Δ Market Cap
$-12.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABT
18.2% Overvalued
Price is 18.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $105.70
Fair Value: $89.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LMT
49.8% Overvalued
Price is 49.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $582.74
Fair Value: $388.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $106?

+12.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.8%

The market implies +12.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

LMT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $583?

+13.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.9%

The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABT
86/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LMT
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABT
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LMT
-2.23
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABT
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 83.0%Retail & Other 16.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,843
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LMT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,330
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABT
1
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.40M
STRATTON JOHN G.
Director
$173,640
@ $86.82 · 2026-05-07
STARKS DANIEL J
Director
$926,537
@ $92.65 · 2026-04-27
BOUDREAU PHILIP P
Chief Financial Officer
$201,300
@ $91.50 · 2026-04-23
STARKS DANIEL J
Director
$1.09M
@ $108.73 · 2026-02-04
FORD ROBERT B.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.01M
@ $107.13 · 2026-01-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LMT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABT
0
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.44M
SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
Officer
$102,288
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
MCCOY JOHN A. JR
Officer
$67,614
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
MORRONE LOUIS H
Officer
$132,224
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
SHROFF ERIC
Officer
$81,946
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
CUSHMAN ELIZABETH C
General Counsel
$30,398
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
MORELAND MARY K
Officer
$70,851
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
SHROFF ERIC
Officer
$203,043
@ $128.02 · 2025-11-25
BOUDREAU PHILIP P
Chief Financial Officer
$746,758
@ $134.55 · 2025-08-08
BLOUNT SALLY E
Director
$337,116
@ $129.66 · 2025-04-30
EARNHARDT LISA D
President
$12.23M
@ $133.83 · 2025-03-07
MCCOY JOHN A. JR
Officer
$77,652
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
SHROFF ERIC
Officer
$77,652
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
MORELAND MARY K
Officer
$109,292
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
MORRONE LOUIS H
Officer
$153,507
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
WAINER ANDREA F
Officer
$131,123
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
FORD ROBERT B.
Chief Executive Officer
$37.44M
@ $131.17 · 2025-02-05
SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
Officer
$3.05M
@ $128.50 · 2025-01-30
ALLEN HUBERT L.
Officer
$24.34M
@ $128.26 · 2025-01-30
ALLEN HUBERT L.
Officer
$18.42M
@ $117.04 · 2024-10-21
FORD ROBERT B.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.49M
@ $116.41 · 2024-09-12
MCCOY JOHN A. JR
Officer
$3,100
@ $114.81 · 2024-09-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LMT
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.29M
CAHILL TIMOTHY S
Officer
$3.00M
@ $649.47 · 2026-03-11
ULMER GREGORY M
Officer
$1.87M
@ $658.08 · 2026-02-27
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$1.59M
@ $660.64 · 2026-02-24
ST JOHN FRANK A
Chief Operating Officer
$3.83M
@ $491.04 · 2025-10-23
LIGHTFOOT ROBERT M JR
Officer
$1.42M
@ $442.42 · 2025-02-26
PAUL HARRY EDWARD III
Officer
$312,923
@ $442.61 · 2025-02-26
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$2.12M
@ $442.51 · 2025-02-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LMT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
LMT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View ABT Full AnalysisView LMT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ABT vs LMT

Is Abbott Laboratories or Lockheed Martin Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ABT trades at a -18.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $89 vs. price $106), compared to LMT's -49.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $389 vs. $583).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Abbott Laboratories or Lockheed Martin Corporation?

ABT scores 86/100 (Wide moat), while LMT scores 74/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Abbott Laboratories or Lockheed Martin Corporation?

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) generates a 4.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Abbott Laboratories's 3.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Abbott Laboratories or Lockheed Martin Corporation?

LMT earns 24.8% ROIC versus ABT's 6.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Abbott Laboratories's or Lockheed Martin Corporation's?

LMT's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to ABT's 84/100 (Very Safe). LMT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.