Compare Stocks › ABT vs DIS

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs The Walt Disney Company (DIS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ABT is overvalued at $106, with a DCF intrinsic value of $76 and a margin of safety of -39%. DIS is fairly valued at $111, with an intrinsic value of $135 and a margin of safety of 18%. Of the two, DIS has the wider margin of safety.

ABT
Abbott Laboratories
$106.20
VS
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
$110.94

Rewards

ABT
  • ★Abbott Laboratories scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 5.60 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
DIS
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 111.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.06 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 2 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

ABT
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 39.5x is 45% above the historical average of 27.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $46.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
DIS
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.61 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABT
DIS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$10.08B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.26%
39.48
Trailing P/E
22.87
17.89
Forward P/E
14.80
Quality & Moat
5.12%
ROIC
9.25%
12.60%
ROE
8.01%
57.08%
Gross Margin
37.59%
1.52
PEG Ratio
3.61
Balance Sheet Safety
0.52
Net Debt / Equity
0.35
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.27
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.95
2.37%
Dividend Yield
1.35%
ABT: 4Ties: 1DIS: 5
ABTDIS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DIS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABT
$1.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$14.14B
Δ Market Cap
+$26.79B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DIS
$2.96
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$16.56B
Δ Market Cap
+$49.03B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABT
39.4% Overvalued
Price is 39.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $106.20
Fair Value: $76.17
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DIS
17.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 17.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $110.94
Fair Value: $134.67
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABT

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

DIS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $111?

+6.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.6%

The market implies +6.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABT
86/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DIS
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABT
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DIS
-2.61
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABT
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 81.9%Retail & Other 17.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,841
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DIS
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,852
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABT
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.40M
STRATTON JOHN G.
Director
$173,640
@ $86.82 · 2026-05-07
STARKS DANIEL J
Director
$926,537
@ $92.65 · 2026-04-27
BOUDREAU PHILIP P
Chief Financial Officer
$201,300
@ $91.50 · 2026-04-23
STARKS DANIEL J
Director
$1.09M
@ $108.73 · 2026-02-04
FORD ROBERT B.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.01M
@ $107.13 · 2026-01-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DIS
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.11M
CHANG AMY L
Director
$98,791
@ $107.85 · 2026-02-12
GORMAN JAMES P
Director
$2.01M
@ $111.89 · 2025-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABT
3
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $47.54M
MCCOY JOHN A. JR
Officer
$2,958
@ $109.56 · 2026-09-02
FORD ROBERT B.
Chief Executive Officer
$46.20M
@ $115.85 · 2026-08-25
MORRONE LOUIS H
Officer
$642,506
@ $109.83 · 2026-08-11
MORRONE LOUIS H
Officer
$132,224
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
MORELAND MARY K
Officer
$70,851
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
SHROFF ERIC
Officer
$81,946
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
CUSHMAN ELIZABETH C
General Counsel
$30,398
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
Officer
$102,288
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
MCCOY JOHN A. JR
Officer
$67,614
@ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
SHROFF ERIC
Officer
$203,043
@ $128.02 · 2025-11-25
BOUDREAU PHILIP P
Chief Financial Officer
$746,758
@ $134.55 · 2025-08-08
BLOUNT SALLY E
Director
$337,116
@ $129.66 · 2025-04-30
EARNHARDT LISA D
President
$12.23M
@ $133.83 · 2025-03-07
MORRONE LOUIS H
Officer
$153,507
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
MORELAND MARY K
Officer
$109,292
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
SHROFF ERIC
Officer
$77,652
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
MCCOY JOHN A. JR
Officer
$77,652
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
WAINER ANDREA F
Officer
$131,123
@ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
FORD ROBERT B.
Chief Executive Officer
$37.44M
@ $131.17 · 2025-02-05
SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
Officer
$3.05M
@ $128.50 · 2025-01-30
ALLEN HUBERT L.
Officer
$24.34M
@ $128.26 · 2025-01-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DIS
4
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.41M
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$318,958
@ $111.68 · 2026-10-16
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$387,596
@ $107.13 · 2026-09-01
ROEDER PAUL M
Officer
$382,327
@ $106.32 · 2026-08-19
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$762,234
@ $105.31 · 2026-08-14
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$281,922
@ $114.00 · 2026-01-22
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$277,134
@ $114.00 · 2025-12-24
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$233,701
@ $118.57 · 2025-08-25
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$110,845
@ $110.84 · 2025-05-13
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$74,936
@ $108.76 · 2025-01-22
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$342,766
@ $111.36 · 2024-12-17
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$917,920
@ $114.74 · 2024-12-11
IGER ROBERT A
Chief Executive Officer
$42.67M
@ $114.57 · 2024-11-22
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$568,101
@ $113.62 · 2024-11-20
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$279,772
@ $99.99 · 2024-11-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DIS
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABT
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
DIS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View ABT Full AnalysisView DIS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ABT vs DIS

Is Abbott Laboratories or The Walt Disney Company more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DIS trades at a 17.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $135 vs. price $111), compared to ABT's -39.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $76 vs. $106).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Abbott Laboratories or The Walt Disney Company?▼

ABT scores 86/100 (Wide moat), while DIS scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Walt Disney Company in financial distress?▼

DIS's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ABT scores 5.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Abbott Laboratories or The Walt Disney Company?▼

DIS earns 9.3% ROIC versus ABT's 5.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Abbott Laboratories's or The Walt Disney Company's?▼

DIS's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to ABT's 84/100 (Very Safe). DIS has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.