Compare Stocks › ABT vs BA

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs The Boeing Company (BA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ABT is overvalued at $106, with a DCF intrinsic value of $76 and a margin of safety of -39%. BA is fairly valued at $172, with an intrinsic value of $179 and a margin of safety of 4%. Of the two, BA has the wider margin of safety.

ABT
Abbott Laboratories
$106.20
VS
BA
The Boeing Company
$171.55

Rewards

ABT
  • ★Abbott Laboratories scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 5.60 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
BA

    Risks

    ABT
    • ⚠Trailing P/E of 39.5x is 45% above the historical average of 27.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • ⚠Insiders have sold $46.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    BA
    • ⚠Gross margin of 9.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠The Boeing Company scores only 23/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Share count has increased by 31% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ABT
    BA
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.72B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    3.47%
    39.48
    Trailing P/E
    17.70
    17.89
    Forward P/E
    68.39
    Quality & Moat
    5.12%
    ROIC
    0.41%
    12.60%
    ROE
    28.80%
    57.08%
    Gross Margin
    9.45%
    1.52
    PEG Ratio
    1.51
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.52
    Net Debt / Equity
    4.24
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.27
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    13.81
    2.37%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    ABT: 6Ties: 2BA: 2
    ABTBA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ABT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    BA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ABT
    $1.89
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $14.14B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$26.79B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    BA
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-12.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$56.54B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ABT
    39.4% Overvalued
    Price is 39.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $106.20
    Fair Value: $76.17
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    BA
    4.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 4.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $171.55
    Fair Value: $179.15
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ABT

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    BA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $172?

    +25.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.2%

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ABT
    86/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    BA
    23/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ABT
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    BA

    Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ABT
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 81.9%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,841
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    BA
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.6%Retail & Other 23.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,111
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ABT
    0
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.40M
    STRATTON JOHN G.
    Director
    $173,640
    @ $86.82 · 2026-05-07
    STARKS DANIEL J
    Director
    $926,537
    @ $92.65 · 2026-04-27
    BOUDREAU PHILIP P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $201,300
    @ $91.50 · 2026-04-23
    STARKS DANIEL J
    Director
    $1.09M
    @ $108.73 · 2026-02-04
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $107.13 · 2026-01-23
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    BA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $898,413
    TILDEN BRADLEY DOUGLAS
    Director
    $299,345
    @ $218.50 · 2026-05-20
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $499,966
    @ $224.20 · 2026-03-03
    DEASY DANA S
    Officer
    $99,102
    @ $178.88 · 2025-11-24
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $497,420
    @ $226.10 · 2025-08-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ABT
    3
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $47.54M
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $2,958
    @ $109.56 · 2026-09-02
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $46.20M
    @ $115.85 · 2026-08-25
    MORRONE LOUIS H
    Officer
    $642,506
    @ $109.83 · 2026-08-11
    SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
    Officer
    $102,288
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MORRONE LOUIS H
    Officer
    $132,224
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $81,946
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    CUSHMAN ELIZABETH C
    General Counsel
    $30,398
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MORELAND MARY K
    Officer
    $70,851
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $67,614
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $203,043
    @ $128.02 · 2025-11-25
    BOUDREAU PHILIP P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $746,758
    @ $134.55 · 2025-08-08
    BLOUNT SALLY E
    Director
    $337,116
    @ $129.66 · 2025-04-30
    EARNHARDT LISA D
    President
    $12.23M
    @ $133.83 · 2025-03-07
    MORRONE LOUIS H
    Officer
    $153,507
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $77,652
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    MORELAND MARY K
    Officer
    $109,292
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $77,652
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    WAINER ANDREA F
    Officer
    $131,123
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $37.44M
    @ $131.17 · 2025-02-05
    ALLEN HUBERT L.
    Officer
    $24.34M
    @ $128.26 · 2025-01-30
    SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
    Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $128.50 · 2025-01-30
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    BA
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.25M
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $351,484
    @ $233.85 · 2026-02-24
    SCHMIDT ANN M
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $243.37 · 2026-02-17
    MCKENZIE HOWARD E
    Officer
    $2.46M
    @ $234.01 · 2026-02-05
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $644,598
    @ $236.03 · 2026-02-04
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $270,009
    @ $197.66 · 2025-11-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $867,069
    @ $229.99 · 2025-08-08
    NELSON BRENDAN J.
    President
    $132,019
    @ $206.28 · 2025-05-15
    SHOCKEY JEFFREY S
    Officer
    $650,198
    @ $202.87 · 2025-05-13
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $558,009
    @ $186.00 · 2025-05-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $729,164
    @ $187.01 · 2025-05-02
    POPE STEPHANIE F
    Officer
    $3.08M
    @ $183.78 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $368,018
    @ $184.01 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $268,530
    @ $179.02 · 2025-02-26
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $570,759
    @ $180.73 · 2025-02-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ABT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(55/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    BA
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(27/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ABT
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
    BA
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
    View ABT Full AnalysisView BA Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ABT vs BA

    Is Abbott Laboratories or The Boeing Company more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BA trades at a 4.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $179 vs. price $172), compared to ABT's -39.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $76 vs. $106).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Abbott Laboratories or The Boeing Company?▼

    ABT scores 86/100 (Wide moat), while BA scores 23/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is The Boeing Company in financial distress?▼

    BA's Altman Z-Score of 1.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ABT scores 5.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Abbott Laboratories or The Boeing Company?▼

    ABT earns 5.1% ROIC versus BA's 0.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Abbott Laboratories's or The Boeing Company's?▼

    ABT's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to BA's 70/100 (Safe). ABT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.