SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › ABBV vs ROL

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs Rollins, Inc. (ROL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ABBV is overvalued at $251, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -41%. ROL is overvalued at $38, with an intrinsic value of $34 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, ROL has the wider margin of safety.

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$250.94
VS
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
$37.97

Rewards

ABBV
  • ★AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 72.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★AbbVie Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
ROL
  • ★Rollins, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Rollins, Inc. scores 98/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 14.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

ABBV
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
ROL
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.80 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠17 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
ROL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$501.74M
N/A
FCF Yield
2.75%
70.89
Trailing P/E
34.52
15.41
Forward P/E
28.94
Quality & Moat
27.60%
ROIC
22.90%
N/A
ROE
37.01%
72.79%
Gross Margin
52.37%
0.41
PEG Ratio
2.80
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.70
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.16
2.76%
Dividend Yield
1.92%
ABBV: 5Ties: 1ROL: 2
ABBVROL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ROL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ROL
$20.24
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$537.8M
Δ Market Cap
+$10.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
40.7% Overvalued
Price is 40.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $250.94
Fair Value: $178.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ROL
12.2% Overvalued
Price is 12.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $37.97
Fair Value: $33.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ROL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $38?

+13.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.6%

The market implies +13.6% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +16.6%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ROL
98/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ROL
-2.71
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,146
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ROL
Insiders 38.4%Institutions 61.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,169
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ROL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ROL
0
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.10B
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
General Counsel
$842,971
@ $59.36 · 2026-02-25
ROLLINS GARY W
Officer, Director and Beneficial Owner
$650,605
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
General Counsel
$83,501
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$335,764
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
GAHLHOFF JERRY JR
Chief Executive Officer
$82,119
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$20,294
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
ROLLINS GARY W
Officer, Director and Beneficial Owner
$1.21M
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
General Counsel
$136,072
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$476,854
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
GAHLHOFF JERRY JR
Chief Executive Officer
$285,303
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$56,112
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$143,904
@ $60.06 · 2026-01-09
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$90,288
@ $59.40 · 2025-12-15
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$143,113
@ $59.73 · 2025-12-12
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$138,359
@ $57.77 · 2025-11-14
LOR INC
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$1.10B
@ $56.93 · 2025-11-10
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$57,130
@ $57.13 · 2025-08-20
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$1.74M
@ $58.04 · 2025-07-24
GAHLHOFF JERRY JR
Chief Executive Officer
$854,700
@ $56.98 · 2025-06-11
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$2.27M
@ $56.77 · 2025-05-29
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$108,613
@ $56.54 · 2025-05-09
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$99,469
@ $51.78 · 2025-03-10
HORNFECK TRACI
Officer
$171,194
@ $53.10 · 2025-03-04
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
General Counsel
$675,218
@ $51.18 · 2025-02-21
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
Officer
$236,546
@ $50.49 · 2024-10-01
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
Officer
$237,717
@ $50.74 · 2024-09-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ROL
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
ROL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView ROL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ABBV vs ROL

Is AbbVie Inc. or Rollins, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ROL trades at a -12.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $34 vs. price $38), compared to ABBV's -40.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $178 vs. $251).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, AbbVie Inc. or Rollins, Inc.?▼

ROL scores 98/100 (Wide moat), while ABBV scores 82/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is AbbVie Inc. in financial distress?▼

ABBV's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ROL scores 12.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AbbVie Inc. or Rollins, Inc.?▼

ABBV earns 27.6% ROIC versus ROL's 22.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, AbbVie Inc.'s or Rollins, Inc.'s?▼

ROL's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to ABBV's 39/100 (Unsafe). ROL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.