Compare StocksABBV vs Q

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q)

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$206.60
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$143.33

Rewards

ABBV
  • AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 72.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • AbbVie Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
Q

    Risks

    ABBV
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 100.8x is 61% above the historical average of 62.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Insiders have sold $10.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    Q
    • FCF yield of 2.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 2.91 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    Q
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $776.50M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    2.58%
    100.78
    Trailing P/E
    43.43
    12.77
    Forward P/E
    32.66
    Quality & Moat
    22.90%
    ROIC
    6.45%
    N/A
    ROE
    9.39%
    72.03%
    Gross Margin
    46.17%
    0.57
    PEG Ratio
    2.91
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Debt / Equity
    0.61
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.10
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.58
    3.35%
    Dividend Yield
    0.22%
    ABBV: 6Ties: 1Q: 1
    ABBVQ

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ABBV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Q

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-19.85B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$118.02B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    Q
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    481.9% Overvalued
    Price is 481.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $206.60
    Fair Value: $35.50
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    Q
    54.9% Overvalued
    Price is 54.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $143.33
    Fair Value: $92.54
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ABBV

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Q

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $143?

    +19.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.3%

    The market implies +19.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    83/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    Q
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    -2.86
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    Q
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.5%Retail & Other 23.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,052
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    Q
    Insiders 0.0%Institutions 74.6%Retail & Other 25.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,353
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    Q
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $329,572
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $250,452
    @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
    GREEN BYRON
    Director
    $79,120
    @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    3
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $21.79M
    PURDUE DAVID R.
    Officer
    $1.22M
    @ $233.56 · 2026-03-04
    SIATIS PERRY C.
    General Counsel
    $4.38M
    @ $234.39 · 2026-03-02
    SIATIS PERRY C.
    General Counsel
    $5.15M
    @ $230.00 · 2026-02-25
    SALEKI-GERHARDT AZITA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $8.41M
    @ $198.42 · 2025-08-12
    DONOGHOE NICHOLAS
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $198.51 · 2025-08-05
    STEWART JEFFREY RYAN
    Officer
    $12.36M
    @ $210.08 · 2025-03-31
    REENTS SCOTT T.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.75M
    @ $212.34 · 2025-03-14
    GONZALEZ RICHARD A
    Director
    $20.26M
    @ $205.45 · 2025-03-03
    SIATIS PERRY C.
    General Counsel
    $5.82M
    @ $208.69 · 2025-03-03
    RICHMOND TIMOTHY J
    Officer
    $4.47M
    @ $210.45 · 2025-03-03
    BUCKBEE KEVIN K
    Officer
    $3.85M
    @ $203.41 · 2025-02-26
    RICHMOND TIMOTHY J
    Officer
    $6.07M
    @ $202.90 · 2025-02-26
    SIATIS PERRY C.
    General Counsel
    $1.14M
    @ $197.90 · 2025-02-20
    BUCKBEE KEVIN K
    Officer
    $310,032
    @ $172.24 · 2024-12-16
    GONZALEZ RICHARD A
    Officer and Director
    $12.40M
    @ $186.52 · 2024-08-05
    GONZALEZ RICHARD A
    Officer and Director
    $49.50M
    @ $175.00 · 2024-07-17
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    Q
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $828,193
    GOSS MICHAEL G.
    Officer
    $160,677
    @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
    KEMP JON D
    Chief Executive Officer
    $480,732
    @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $534.00
    @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
    KANG SANG HO
    Officer
    $186,250
    @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(52/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    Q
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
    Q
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View ABBV Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis
    ABBV vs Q: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io