Compare StocksABBV vs PANW

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ABBV is overvalued at $251, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -41%. PANW is overvalued at $332, with an intrinsic value of $37 and a margin of safety of -802%. Of the two, ABBV has the wider margin of safety.

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$250.94
VS
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
$331.83

Rewards

ABBV
  • AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 72.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • AbbVie Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PANW
  • Gross margin of 72.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 24.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.77 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

ABBV
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
PANW
  • Share count has increased by 12% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 1.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
PANW
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$3.58B
N/A
FCF Yield
1.32%
70.89
Trailing P/E
286.06
15.41
Forward P/E
80.44
Quality & Moat
27.60%
ROIC
-0.69%
N/A
ROE
4.83%
72.79%
Gross Margin
71.96%
0.41
PEG Ratio
3.68
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.66
2.76%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
ABBV: 5Ties: 2PANW: 1
ABBVPANW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PANW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PANW
$19.59
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.15B
Δ Market Cap
+$81.33B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
40.7% Overvalued
Price is 40.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $250.94
Fair Value: $178.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PANW
801.8% Overvalued
Price is 801.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $331.83
Fair Value: $36.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PANW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $332?

+41.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +25.9%

The market implies +41.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +25.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PANW
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PANW
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,146
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PANW
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 82.5%Retail & Other 16.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,616
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PANW
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.00M
ARORA NIKESH
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $146.87 · 2026-03-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $21.79M
PURDUE DAVID RYAN
Officer
$1.22M
@ $233.56 · 2026-03-04
SIATIS PERRY C.
General Counsel
$4.38M
@ $234.39 · 2026-03-02
SIATIS PERRY C.
General Counsel
$5.15M
@ $230.00 · 2026-02-25
SALEKI-GERHARDT AZITA
Chief Operating Officer
$8.41M
@ $198.42 · 2025-08-12
DONOGHOE NICHOLAS
Officer
$2.64M
@ $198.51 · 2025-08-05
STEWART JEFFREY RYAN
Officer
$12.36M
@ $210.08 · 2025-03-31
REENTS SCOTT T.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.75M
@ $212.34 · 2025-03-14
SIATIS PERRY C.
General Counsel
$5.82M
@ $208.69 · 2025-03-03
GONZALEZ RICHARD A
Director
$20.26M
@ $205.45 · 2025-03-03
RICHMOND TIMOTHY J
Officer
$4.47M
@ $210.45 · 2025-03-03
BUCKBEE KEVIN K
Officer
$3.85M
@ $203.41 · 2025-02-26
RICHMOND TIMOTHY J
Officer
$6.07M
@ $202.90 · 2025-02-26
SIATIS PERRY C.
General Counsel
$1.14M
@ $197.90 · 2025-02-20
BUCKBEE KEVIN K
Officer
$310,032
@ $172.24 · 2024-12-16
GONZALEZ RICHARD A
Officer and Director
$12.40M
@ $186.52 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PANW
7
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $341.10M
THORNING SCHMIDT HELLE
Director
$242,795
@ $346.85 · 2026-07-07
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$310,500
@ $345.00 · 2026-07-01
GOLECHHA DIPAK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.45M
@ $289.56 · 2026-06-23
KEY JOHN PHILLIP
Director
$2.09M
@ $279.24 · 2026-06-12
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$313,588
@ $285.08 · 2026-06-01
KLARICH LEE
Officer and Director
$16.27M
@ $258.65 · 2026-05-22
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$94,780
@ $236.95 · 2026-05-20
KEY JOHN PHILLIP
Director
$272,459
@ $173.32 · 2026-04-08
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$177,540
@ $161.40 · 2026-04-01
GOLECHHA DIPAK
Chief Financial Officer
$802,077
@ $160.42 · 2026-04-01
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$251,430
@ $147.90 · 2026-03-02
KLARICH LEE
Chief Technology Officer
$23.07M
@ $191.03 · 2026-01-08
JENKINS WILLIAM D JR
President
$167,068
@ $184.81 · 2026-01-02
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$147,848
@ $184.81 · 2026-01-02
JENKINS WILLIAM D JR
President
$1.17M
@ $188.07 · 2025-12-26
GOLECHHA DIPAK
Chief Financial Officer
$940,910
@ $188.18 · 2025-12-23
KLARICH LEE
Chief Technology Officer
$23.18M
@ $191.91 · 2025-12-03
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$132,573
@ $189.39 · 2025-12-01
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$153,979
@ $219.97 · 2025-11-03
KLARICH LEE
Chief Technology Officer
$26.32M
@ $217.94 · 2025-11-03
KLARICH LEE
Chief Technology Officer
$25.59M
@ $211.92 · 2025-10-06
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$141,512
@ $202.16 · 2025-10-01
ARORA NIKESH
Chief Executive Officer
$172.72M
@ $204.06 · 2025-09-23
GOLECHHA DIPAK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.02M
@ $204.19 · 2025-09-23
KLARICH LEE
Chief Technology Officer
$23.08M
@ $191.11 · 2025-09-03
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$131,334
@ $187.62 · 2025-09-02
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$128,940
@ $184.20 · 2025-08-21
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$20.72M
@ $171.58 · 2025-08-04
ZUK NIR
Chief Technology Officer
$17.28M
@ $172.80 · 2025-08-01
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$24.26M
@ $200.86 · 2025-07-07
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$122,400
@ $204.00 · 2025-07-01
ZUK NIR
Chief Technology Officer
$19.87M
@ $198.66 · 2025-07-01
GOLECHHA DIPAK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.01M
@ $201.85 · 2025-06-23
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$160,840
@ $201.05 · 2025-06-20
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$23.57M
@ $195.14 · 2025-06-04
ZUK NIR
Chief Technology Officer
$19.34M
@ $193.36 · 2025-06-02
BAWA APARNA
Director
$99,940
@ $190.00 · 2025-05-30
JENKINS WILLIAM D JR
President
$500,198
@ $186.15 · 2025-05-23
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$22.86M
@ $189.27 · 2025-05-05
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$75,564
@ $188.91 · 2025-05-01
ZUK NIR
Chief Technology Officer
$18.78M
@ $187.80 · 2025-05-01
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$18.25M
@ $151.13 · 2025-04-07
GOLECHHA DIPAK
Chief Financial Officer
$750,000
@ $150.00 · 2025-04-07
ARORA NIKESH
Chief Executive Officer
$133.33M
@ $169.11 · 2025-04-03
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$151,668
@ $168.52 · 2025-04-01
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$129,850
@ $185.50 · 2025-03-20
ARORA NIKESH
Chief Executive Officer
$12.70M
@ $181.56 · 2025-03-05
ARORA NIKESH
Chief Executive Officer
$132.77M
@ $184.80 · 2025-03-04
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$18.79M
@ $188.56 · 2025-03-03
JENKINS WILLIAM D JR
President
$493,370
@ $205.49 · 2025-02-19
ARORA NIKESH
Chief Executive Officer
$143.81M
@ $182.40 · 2025-02-04
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$126,854
@ $181.22 · 2025-02-03
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$18.19M
@ $182.45 · 2025-02-03
ARORA NIKESH
Chief Executive Officer
$143.09M
@ $181.50 · 2025-01-06
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$21.56M
@ $179.70 · 2025-01-06
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$258,300
@ $184.50 · 2025-01-02
MCCARTHY MARY PAT
Director
$2.40M
@ $400.16 · 2024-12-12
ESCHENBACH CARL M
Director
$3.65M
@ $405.38 · 2024-12-04
BAWA APARNA
Director
$100,004
@ $400.02 · 2024-12-04
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$23.36M
@ $389.41 · 2024-12-02
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$78,048
@ $390.24 · 2024-12-02
GOLECHHA DIPAK
Chief Financial Officer
$975,600
@ $390.24 · 2024-12-02
JENKINS WILLIAM D JR
President
$506,288
@ $387.96 · 2024-11-25
ZUK NIR
Chief Technology Officer
$65.08M
@ $387.39 · 2024-11-25
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$21.64M
@ $360.65 · 2024-11-04
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$71,806
@ $359.03 · 2024-11-01
ARORA NIKESH
Chief Executive Officer
$30.02M
@ $367.99 · 2024-10-10
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$20.39M
@ $339.81 · 2024-10-04
ZUK NIR
Chief Technology Officer
$11.97M
@ $332.50 · 2024-10-01
KLARICH LEE
Officer
$20.70M
@ $344.98 · 2024-09-04
ARORA NIKESH
Chief Executive Officer
$22.87M
@ $342.98 · 2024-09-04
PAUL JOSHUA D.
Officer
$71,814
@ $359.07 · 2024-09-03
GOLECHHA DIPAK
Chief Financial Officer
$897,675
@ $359.07 · 2024-09-03
ZUK NIR
Chief Technology Officer
$12.93M
@ $359.17 · 2024-09-03
MCCARTHY MARY PAT
Director
$3.48M
@ $348.49 · 2024-08-27
KEY JOHN PHILLIP
Director
$1.05M
@ $349.68 · 2024-08-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PANW
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
PANW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView PANW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ABBV vs PANW

Is AbbVie Inc. or Palo Alto Networks, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ABBV trades at a -40.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $178 vs. price $251), compared to PANW's -801.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $37 vs. $332).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, AbbVie Inc. or Palo Alto Networks, Inc.?

ABBV scores 82/100 (Wide moat), while PANW scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is AbbVie Inc. in financial distress?

ABBV's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PANW scores 5.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AbbVie Inc. or Palo Alto Networks, Inc.?

ABBV earns 27.6% ROIC versus PANW's -0.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.