Compare StocksABBV vs NTAP

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ABBV is overvalued at $251, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -41%. NTAP is fairly valued at $179, with an intrinsic value of $169 and a margin of safety of -6%. Of the two, NTAP has the wider margin of safety.

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$250.94
VS
NTAP
NetApp, Inc.
$178.50

Rewards

ABBV
  • AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 72.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • AbbVie Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
NTAP
  • NetApp, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 70.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • NetApp, Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ABBV
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
NTAP
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 28.1x is 31% above the historical average of 21.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.01 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
NTAP
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.87B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.34%
70.89
Trailing P/E
28.11
15.41
Forward P/E
18.14
Quality & Moat
27.60%
ROIC
36.52%
N/A
ROE
106.73%
72.79%
Gross Margin
70.74%
0.41
PEG Ratio
2.01
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.45
2.76%
Dividend Yield
1.17%
ABBV: 3Ties: 2NTAP: 3
ABBVNTAP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NTAP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NTAP
$7.42
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$16.30B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
40.7% Overvalued
Price is 40.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $250.94
Fair Value: $178.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NTAP
5.9% Overvalued
Price is 5.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $178.50
Fair Value: $168.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

NTAP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $179?

+11.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.5%

The market implies +11.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NTAP
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NTAP
-2.70
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,146
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NTAP
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 105.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,339
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NTAP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GUSTAFSSON PER ANDERS
Director
$499,597
@ $90.44 · 2025-03-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NTAP
7
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.61M
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$170,920
@ $170.92 · 2026-07-10
CERNUDA REGO CESAR
President
$7.66M
@ $154.82 · 2026-06-23
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$163,480
@ $163.48 · 2026-06-10
HELD GERALD D
Director
$1.28M
@ $180.00 · 2026-06-03
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$38,495
@ $171.09 · 2026-06-01
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$33,000
@ $120.00 · 2026-05-18
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$117,730
@ $117.73 · 2026-05-11
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$96,250
@ $96.25 · 2026-04-10
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$100,670
@ $100.67 · 2026-03-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$25,664
@ $101.84 · 2026-02-17
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$103,450
@ $103.45 · 2026-02-10
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$105,490
@ $105.49 · 2026-01-12
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$117,370
@ $117.37 · 2025-12-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$3,631
@ $110.03 · 2025-12-01
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$35,146
@ $107.48 · 2025-11-17
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$114,290
@ $114.29 · 2025-11-10
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$119,000
@ $119.00 · 2025-10-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$94,937
@ $121.87 · 2025-09-25
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.08M
@ $122.91 · 2025-09-17
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$123,670
@ $123.67 · 2025-09-10
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$925,225
@ $108.85 · 2025-08-18
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$105,900
@ $105.90 · 2025-08-11
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$918,680
@ $108.08 · 2025-07-21
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$106,840
@ $106.84 · 2025-07-10
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$865,130
@ $101.78 · 2025-06-16
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$54,416
@ $103.06 · 2025-06-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$29,829
@ $98.77 · 2025-06-03
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$850,145
@ $100.02 · 2025-05-19
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$32,593
@ $99.98 · 2025-05-16
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$44,070
@ $97.50 · 2025-05-12
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$695,555
@ $81.83 · 2025-04-21
CERNUDA REGO CESAR
President
$1.78M
@ $90.15 · 2025-03-28
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$787,277
@ $92.62 · 2025-03-17
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$48,882
@ $92.58 · 2025-03-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$36,263
@ $121.28 · 2025-02-19
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.01M
@ $119.04 · 2025-02-18
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$54,579
@ $120.75 · 2025-02-10
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.05M
@ $123.03 · 2025-01-21
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$52,672
@ $116.79 · 2025-01-10
CERNUDA REGO CESAR
President
$2.53M
@ $114.99 · 2024-12-30
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.06M
@ $124.29 · 2024-12-16
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$98,106
@ $127.41 · 2024-12-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$38,285
@ $117.44 · 2024-11-18
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $118.00 · 2024-11-18
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$62,186
@ $123.63 · 2024-11-11
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.07M
@ $126.11 · 2024-10-21
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$88,971
@ $126.20 · 2024-10-10
CERNUDA REGO CESAR
President
$2.69M
@ $122.16 · 2024-09-30
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$208,266
@ $123.60 · 2024-09-24
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$993,115
@ $116.84 · 2024-09-16
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$80,742
@ $114.69 · 2024-09-10
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $130.00 · 2024-08-19
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$86,233
@ $122.49 · 2024-08-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NTAP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
NTAP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView NTAP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ABBV vs NTAP

Is AbbVie Inc. or NetApp, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, NTAP trades at a -5.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $169 vs. price $179), compared to ABBV's -40.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $178 vs. $251).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, AbbVie Inc. or NetApp, Inc.?

NTAP scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while ABBV scores 82/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is AbbVie Inc. in financial distress?

ABBV's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NTAP scores 3.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AbbVie Inc. or NetApp, Inc.?

NTAP earns 36.5% ROIC versus ABBV's 27.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, AbbVie Inc.'s or NetApp, Inc.'s?

NTAP's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to ABBV's 39/100 (Unsafe). NTAP has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.