SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › ABBV vs MTB

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs M&T Bank Corporation (MTB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ABBV is overvalued at $251, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -41%. MTB is undervalued at $246, with an intrinsic value of $507 and a margin of safety of 51%. Of the two, MTB has the wider margin of safety.

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$250.94
VS
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
$246.29

Rewards

ABBV
  • ★AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 72.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★AbbVie Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
MTB
  • ★M&T Bank Corporation scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.15 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

ABBV
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
MTB
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.28 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠6 insider sales totaling $7.3M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
MTB
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
70.89
Trailing P/E
13.04
15.41
Forward P/E
11.70
Quality & Moat
27.60%
ROIC
18.52%
N/A
ROE
10.74%
72.79%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.41
PEG Ratio
1.65
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.76%
Dividend Yield
2.44%
ABBV: 4Ties: 1MTB: 2
ABBVMTB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MTB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MTB
$1.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$5.13B
Δ Market Cap
+$6.03B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
40.7% Overvalued
Price is 40.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $250.94
Fair Value: $178.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MTB
51.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 51.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $246.29
Fair Value: $506.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

MTB

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MTB
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MTB
-2.42
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,146
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MTB
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 94.0%Retail & Other 5.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,470
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MTB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MTB
6
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $16.76M
PEARSON KEVIN J
Officer
$484,000
@ $242.00 · 2026-07-15
WOODROW TRACY S
Officer
$213,202
@ $242.00 · 2026-07-01
TAYLOR JOHN R
Officer
$256,087
@ $233.23 · 2026-06-15
PEARSON KEVIN J
Officer
$5.27M
@ $225.50 · 2026-06-09
PEARSON KEVIN J
Officer
$440,000
@ $220.00 · 2026-06-04
KAY CHRISTOPHER E
Officer
$672,232
@ $216.50 · 2026-05-07
WISLER MICHAEL A
Officer
$1.84M
@ $223.51 · 2026-02-26
WOODROW TRACY S
Officer
$246,623
@ $234.21 · 2026-02-11
BARNES JOHN P
Director
$5.00M
@ $235.85 · 2026-02-09
WALTERS KIRK W
Director
$206,676
@ $227.37 · 2026-02-03
TAYLOR JOHN R
Officer
$158,638
@ $225.34 · 2026-02-02
GEISEL GARY N
Director
$191,369
@ $215.99 · 2026-01-28
KAY CHRISTOPHER E
Officer
$1.01M
@ $191.70 · 2025-11-26
WOODROW TRACY S
Officer
$693,061
@ $202.12 · 2025-08-29
TAYLOR JOHN R
Officer
$89,502
@ $199.78 · 2025-08-26
D'ARCY PETER
Officer
$485,570
@ $197.31 · 2025-07-22
LEDGETT RICHARD H. JR.
Director
$252,178
@ $197.48 · 2025-07-21
KAY CHRISTOPHER E
Officer
$299,527
@ $172.34 · 2025-03-12
WOODROW TRACY S
Officer
$468,200
@ $220.74 · 2024-11-26
SALAMONE DENIS J
Director
$2.23M
@ $223.41 · 2024-11-25
WISLER MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.40M
@ $213.05 · 2024-11-14
TODARO MICHAEL J
Officer
$1.02M
@ $214.10 · 2024-11-12
PEARSON KEVIN J
Officer
$1.47M
@ $195.88 · 2024-11-01
TAYLOR JOHN R
Officer
$280,057
@ $195.03 · 2024-10-28
JONES RENE F.
Chief Executive Officer
$4.47M
@ $193.88 · 2024-10-28
O HARA LAURA PROSKE
Officer
$956,118
@ $196.93 · 2024-10-28
SALAMONE DENIS J
Director
$1.72M
@ $172.03 · 2024-09-03
PEARSON KEVIN J
Officer
$989,066
@ $162.27 · 2024-08-09
TODARO MICHAEL J
Officer
$778,897
@ $162.58 · 2024-08-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MTB
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
MTB
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView MTB Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ABBV vs MTB

Is AbbVie Inc. or M&T Bank Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MTB trades at a 51.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $507 vs. price $246), compared to ABBV's -40.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $178 vs. $251).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, AbbVie Inc. or M&T Bank Corporation?▼

ABBV scores 82/100 (Wide moat), while MTB scores 79/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is M&T Bank Corporation in financial distress?▼

MTB's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ABBV scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AbbVie Inc. or M&T Bank Corporation?▼

ABBV earns 27.6% ROIC versus MTB's 18.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, AbbVie Inc.'s or M&T Bank Corporation's?▼

MTB's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ABBV's 39/100 (Unsafe). MTB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.