SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › ABBV vs LULU

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs lululemon athletica inc. (LULU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ABBV is overvalued at $216, with a DCF intrinsic value of $160 and a margin of safety of -35%. LULU is undervalued at $112, with an intrinsic value of $235 and a margin of safety of 53%. Of the two, LULU has the wider margin of safety.

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$216.49
VS
LULU
lululemon athletica inc.
$111.77

Rewards

ABBV
  • ★AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 72.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★AbbVie Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
LULU
  • ★lululemon athletica inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★lululemon athletica inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 41.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

ABBV
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 105.6x is 69% above the historical average of 62.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
LULU

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    LULU
    Valuation
    $20.81B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.13B
    5.44%
    FCF Yield
    8.93%
    105.60
    Trailing P/E
    9.05
    13.32
    Forward P/E
    9.74
    Quality & Moat
    21.89%
    ROIC
    14.25%
    N/A
    ROE
    32.03%
    72.03%
    Gross Margin
    55.69%
    0.61
    PEG Ratio
    0.64
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.13
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.12
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.24
    3.11%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    ABBV: 4Ties: 2LULU: 4
    ABBVLULU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ABBV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    LULU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-19.85B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$118.02B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LULU
    $-10.53
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $4.94B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-52.08B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    35.3% Overvalued
    Price is 35.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $216.49
    Fair Value: $160.05
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LULU
    52.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 52.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $111.77
    Fair Value: $235.32
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ABBV

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $216?

    +17.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.7%

    The market implies +17.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    LULU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $112?

    -4.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +0.4%

    The market implies -4.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    82/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    LULU
    93/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    -2.86
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LULU
    -1.92
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,106
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LULU
    Insiders 4.7%Institutions 82.5%Retail & Other 12.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,393
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LULU
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.49M
    MAESTRINI ANDRE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $494,590
    @ $151.02 · 2026-04-01
    BERGH CHARLES V
    Director
    $999,978
    @ $164.20 · 2026-03-20
    MCDONALD CALVIN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $260.00 · 2024-09-03
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $21.79M
    PURDUE DAVID R.
    Officer
    $1.22M
    @ $233.56 · 2026-03-04
    SIATIS PERRY C.
    General Counsel
    $4.38M
    @ $234.39 · 2026-03-02
    SIATIS PERRY C.
    General Counsel
    $5.15M
    @ $230.00 · 2026-02-25
    SALEKI-GERHARDT AZITA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $8.41M
    @ $198.42 · 2025-08-12
    DONOGHOE NICHOLAS
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $198.51 · 2025-08-05
    STEWART JEFFREY RYAN
    Officer
    $12.36M
    @ $210.08 · 2025-03-31
    REENTS SCOTT T.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.75M
    @ $212.34 · 2025-03-14
    GONZALEZ RICHARD A
    Director
    $20.26M
    @ $205.45 · 2025-03-03
    SIATIS PERRY C.
    General Counsel
    $5.82M
    @ $208.69 · 2025-03-03
    RICHMOND TIMOTHY J
    Officer
    $4.47M
    @ $210.45 · 2025-03-03
    BUCKBEE KEVIN K
    Officer
    $3.85M
    @ $203.41 · 2025-02-26
    RICHMOND TIMOTHY J
    Officer
    $6.07M
    @ $202.90 · 2025-02-26
    SIATIS PERRY C.
    General Counsel
    $1.14M
    @ $197.90 · 2025-02-20
    BUCKBEE KEVIN K
    Officer
    $310,032
    @ $172.24 · 2024-12-16
    GONZALEZ RICHARD A
    Officer and Director
    $12.40M
    @ $186.52 · 2024-08-05
    GONZALEZ RICHARD A
    Officer and Director
    $49.50M
    @ $175.00 · 2024-07-17
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LULU
    1
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $9.90M
    NEUBURGER NICOLE
    Officer
    $100,142
    @ $161.00 · 2026-04-08
    FRANK MEGHAN
    Chief Financial Officer
    $561,821
    @ $211.37 · 2025-12-30
    BURGOYNE CELESTE
    Officer
    $2.76M
    @ $204.00 · 2025-12-16
    NEUBURGER NICOLE
    Officer
    $109,470
    @ $178.00 · 2025-09-30
    MCDONALD CALVIN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.38M
    @ $235.69 · 2025-06-27
    NEUBURGER NICOLE
    Officer
    $782,735
    @ $387.11 · 2024-12-26
    BURGOYNE CELESTE
    Officer
    $10.09M
    @ $405.54 · 2024-12-09
    NEUBURGER NICOLE
    Officer
    $131,021
    @ $269.59 · 2024-09-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(56/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LULU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(25/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
    LULU
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
    View ABBV Full AnalysisView LULU Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ABBV vs LULU

    Is AbbVie Inc. or lululemon athletica inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, LULU trades at a 52.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $235 vs. price $112), compared to ABBV's -35.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $160 vs. $216).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, AbbVie Inc. or lululemon athletica inc.?▼

    LULU scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while ABBV scores 82/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is AbbVie Inc. in financial distress?▼

    ABBV's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LULU scores 5.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, AbbVie Inc. or lululemon athletica inc.?▼

    lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) generates a 8.9% free cash flow yield, compared to AbbVie Inc.'s 5.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AbbVie Inc. or lululemon athletica inc.?▼

    ABBV earns 21.9% ROIC versus LULU's 14.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    ABBV vs LULU: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io