SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › ABBV vs FTV

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs Fortive Corporation (FTV)

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$206.60
VS
FTV
Fortive Corporation
$59.03

Rewards

ABBV
  • ★AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 72.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★AbbVie Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
FTV
  • ★Gross margin of 63.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.98 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ABBV
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 100.8x is 61% above the historical average of 62.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
FTV
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 34.5x is 37% above the historical average of 25.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
FTV
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$953.61M
N/A
FCF Yield
5.29%
100.78
Trailing P/E
34.52
12.77
Forward P/E
18.41
Quality & Moat
22.90%
ROIC
6.20%
N/A
ROE
8.75%
72.03%
Gross Margin
63.25%
0.57
PEG Ratio
0.98
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
0.59
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.71
3.35%
Dividend Yield
0.44%
ABBV: 6Ties: 1FTV: 1
ABBVFTV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

FTV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
FTV
$0.11
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$1.97B
Δ Market Cap
+$216.3M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
481.9% Overvalued
Price is 481.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $206.60
Fair Value: $35.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
FTV
106.8% Overvalued
Price is 106.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $59.03
Fair Value: $28.55
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

FTV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $59?

+16.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.2%

The market implies +16.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
FTV
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
FTV
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.5%Retail & Other 23.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,052
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
FTV
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 109.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,114
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
FTV
1
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.00M
LASSITER WRIGHT III
Director
$257.00
@ $64.25 · 2026-03-26
LASSITER WRIGHT III
Director
$257.00
@ $64.25 · 2025-12-26
OKERSTROM MARK D
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $47.03 · 2025-08-01
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
FTV
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $17.24M
MITCHELL KATE D
Director
$416,023
@ $58.34 · 2026-02-18
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$2.98M
@ $51.28 · 2025-11-10
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$110,367
@ $50.35 · 2025-10-31
LICO JAMES A
Chief Executive Officer
$12.67M
@ $72.40 · 2025-05-15
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$1.06M
@ $73.88 · 2025-05-12
MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.53M
@ $78.86 · 2025-02-28
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$237,308
@ $79.05 · 2025-02-28
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$457,998
@ $80.52 · 2025-02-26
LICO JAMES A
Chief Executive Officer
$15.76M
@ $80.38 · 2025-02-24
UNDERWOOD PETER C
General Counsel
$382,900
@ $76.58 · 2024-11-11
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$12.32M
@ $71.71 · 2024-11-01
MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
Chief Financial Officer
$508,142
@ $74.03 · 2024-09-13
SCHWARZ JONATHAN L.
Officer
$1.05M
@ $73.80 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
FTV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
FTV
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView FTV Full Analysis
ABBV vs FTV: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io