SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › ABBV vs EVRG

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs Evergy, Inc. (EVRG)

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$206.60
VS
EVRG
Evergy, Inc.
$82.61

Rewards

ABBV
  • ★AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 72.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★AbbVie Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
EVRG
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.68 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

ABBV
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 100.8x is 61% above the historical average of 62.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
EVRG
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 22.6x is 26% above the historical average of 17.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 4.80 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.6x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
EVRG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-862.12M
N/A
FCF Yield
-4.53%
100.78
Trailing P/E
22.57
12.77
Forward P/E
18.20
Quality & Moat
22.90%
ROIC
3.26%
N/A
ROE
8.33%
72.03%
Gross Margin
52.27%
0.57
PEG Ratio
4.80
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
1.50
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.61
3.35%
Dividend Yield
3.37%
ABBV: 5Ties: 2EVRG: 1
ABBVEVRG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

EVRG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EVRG
$3.30
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$681.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$2.25B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
481.9% Overvalued
Price is 481.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $206.60
Fair Value: $35.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EVRG
713.2% Overvalued
Price is 713.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $82.61
Fair Value: $10.16
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

EVRG

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EVRG
42/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EVRG
-0.21
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.5%Retail & Other 23.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,052
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EVRG
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.4%Retail & Other 6.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,207
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EVRG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EVRG
3
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.47M
KING CHARLES LYNN
Chief Technology Officer
$200,533
@ $82.19 · 2026-03-12
HUMPHREY HEATHER A. SUVE
General Counsel
$301,527
@ $82.61 · 2026-03-10
MURTLOW ANN D.
Director
$234,422
@ $82.34 · 2026-02-25
ELWELL LESLEY LISSETTE
Officer
$578,640
@ $72.33 · 2025-09-15
LAWRENCE SANDRA A.J.
Director
$156,500
@ $67.72 · 2025-06-11
KING CHARLES LYNN
Chief Technology Officer
$150,008
@ $65.22 · 2024-11-27
BRYANT KEVIN E.
Officer
$3.03M
@ $62.93 · 2024-11-13
CAISLEY CHARLES A
Officer
$550,753
@ $59.63 · 2024-09-03
HUMPHREY HEATHER A. SUVE
General Counsel
$196,809
@ $58.80 · 2024-08-27
LAWRENCE SANDRA A.J.
Director
$166,464
@ $58.47 · 2024-08-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EVRG
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
EVRG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView EVRG Full Analysis
ABBV vs EVRG: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io