Compare StocksABBV vs DLTR

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ABBV is overvalued at $246, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -38%. DLTR is fairly valued at $131, with an intrinsic value of $130 and a margin of safety of -0%. Of the two, DLTR has the wider margin of safety.

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$245.81
VS
DLTR
Dollar Tree, Inc.
$130.56

Rewards

ABBV
  • AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 72.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • AbbVie Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
DLTR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 13.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Altman Z-Score of 3.86 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

ABBV
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
DLTR
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • High leverage (1.88x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
DLTR
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.44B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.75%
69.44
Trailing P/E
20.96
15.09
Forward P/E
16.99
Quality & Moat
27.60%
ROIC
12.77%
N/A
ROE
33.98%
72.79%
Gross Margin
36.99%
0.41
PEG Ratio
1.59
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.88
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.74
2.76%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
ABBV: 6Ties: 1DLTR: 1
ABBVDLTR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DLTR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DLTR
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-2.75B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.51B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
37.9% Overvalued
Price is 37.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $245.81
Fair Value: $178.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DLTR
0.1% Overvalued
Price is 0.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $130.56
Fair Value: $130.49
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

DLTR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $131?

+10.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.0%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DLTR
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DLTR

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,146
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DLTR
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 105.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,211
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DLTR
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $342,130
GLENDINNING STEWART F
Chief Financial Officer
$342,130
@ $97.75 · 2025-09-08
MAHESHWARI ADITYA
Officer
$59,899
@ $98.20 · 2025-06-18
GLENDINNING STEWART F
Chief Financial Officer
$1.24M
@ $72.75 · 2025-04-15
DOUGLAS WILLIAM W III
Director
$520,822
@ $69.44 · 2025-04-03
HEINRICH DANIEL J
Director
$150,194
@ $68.27 · 2024-09-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $21.79M
PURDUE DAVID RYAN
Officer
$1.22M
@ $233.56 · 2026-03-04
SIATIS PERRY C.
General Counsel
$4.38M
@ $234.39 · 2026-03-02
SIATIS PERRY C.
General Counsel
$5.15M
@ $230.00 · 2026-02-25
SALEKI-GERHARDT AZITA
Chief Operating Officer
$8.41M
@ $198.42 · 2025-08-12
DONOGHOE NICHOLAS
Officer
$2.64M
@ $198.51 · 2025-08-05
STEWART JEFFREY RYAN
Officer
$12.36M
@ $210.08 · 2025-03-31
REENTS SCOTT T.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.75M
@ $212.34 · 2025-03-14
SIATIS PERRY C.
General Counsel
$5.82M
@ $208.69 · 2025-03-03
GONZALEZ RICHARD A
Director
$20.26M
@ $205.45 · 2025-03-03
RICHMOND TIMOTHY J
Officer
$4.47M
@ $210.45 · 2025-03-03
BUCKBEE KEVIN K
Officer
$3.85M
@ $203.41 · 2025-02-26
RICHMOND TIMOTHY J
Officer
$6.07M
@ $202.90 · 2025-02-26
SIATIS PERRY C.
General Counsel
$1.14M
@ $197.90 · 2025-02-20
BUCKBEE KEVIN K
Officer
$310,032
@ $172.24 · 2024-12-16
GONZALEZ RICHARD A
Officer and Director
$12.40M
@ $186.52 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DLTR
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $535,392
AFLATOONI ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$22,956
@ $131.18 · 2026-01-07
BEEBE BRENT A
Officer
$274,230
@ $124.65 · 2025-12-08
AFLATOONI ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$119,328
@ $94.70 · 2025-10-17
STAHL STEPHANIE P
Director
$118,878
@ $100.32 · 2025-09-05
AFLATOONI ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$17,070
@ $97.54 · 2025-06-20
MCNEELY RICHARD L.
Officer
$1.99M
@ $94.62 · 2025-06-06
MAHESHWARI ADITYA
Officer
$92,485
@ $74.71 · 2025-04-14
LEIKEN JONATHAN B
Officer
$13,374
@ $75.56 · 2025-04-01
CREEDON MICHAEL C JR
Chief Executive Officer
$31,162
@ $75.45 · 2025-04-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DLTR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
DLTR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView DLTR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ABBV vs DLTR

Is AbbVie Inc. or Dollar Tree, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DLTR trades at a -0.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $130 vs. price $131), compared to ABBV's -37.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $178 vs. $246).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, AbbVie Inc. or Dollar Tree, Inc.?

ABBV scores 82/100 (Wide moat), while DLTR scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is AbbVie Inc. in financial distress?

ABBV's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DLTR scores 3.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AbbVie Inc. or Dollar Tree, Inc.?

ABBV earns 27.6% ROIC versus DLTR's 12.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

ABBV vs DLTR: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io