Compare StocksABBV vs CBRE

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ABBV is overvalued at $251, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -41%. CBRE is fairly valued at $147, with an intrinsic value of $155 and a margin of safety of 5%. Of the two, CBRE has the wider margin of safety.

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$250.94
VS
CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
$146.81

Rewards

ABBV
  • AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 72.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • AbbVie Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
CBRE
  • PEG ratio of 0.96 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ABBV
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
CBRE
  • Gross margin of 18.6% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
CBRE
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.64B
N/A
FCF Yield
3.85%
70.89
Trailing P/E
33.59
15.41
Forward P/E
16.21
Quality & Moat
27.60%
ROIC
6.24%
N/A
ROE
15.80%
72.79%
Gross Margin
18.57%
0.41
PEG Ratio
0.96
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.02
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.21
2.76%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
ABBV: 6Ties: 1CBRE: 1
ABBVCBRE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CBRE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CBRE
$7.59
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.11B
Δ Market Cap
+$23.62B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
40.7% Overvalued
Price is 40.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $250.94
Fair Value: $178.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CBRE
5.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 5.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $146.81
Fair Value: $155.03
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

CBRE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $147?

+15.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.9%

The market implies +15.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CBRE
55/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CBRE
-2.49
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,146
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CBRE
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 99.3%Retail & Other 0.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,520
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CBRE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
MUNOZ OSCAR X
Director
$242,109
@ $115.29 · 2024-08-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CBRE
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.38M
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$294,165
@ $130.74 · 2026-05-15
DOELLINGER CHAD J
Officer
$15,017
@ $140.35 · 2026-05-05
DOELLINGER CHAD J
Officer
$77,970
@ $132.83 · 2026-03-12
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$1.37M
@ $148.61 · 2026-02-26
KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
Chief Operating Officer
$152,410
@ $152.41 · 2025-11-10
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$315,200
@ $157.60 · 2025-08-13
KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
Chief Operating Officer
$154,900
@ $154.90 · 2025-08-11
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$254,585
@ $129.10 · 2025-05-19
DOELLINGER CHAD J
Officer
$79,015
@ $126.02 · 2025-05-05
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$251,380
@ $125.69 · 2025-03-17
DOELLINGER CHAD J
Officer
$115,603
@ $126.62 · 2025-03-12
QUEENAN DANIEL G
Officer
$1.40M
@ $140.12 · 2024-12-02
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$238,382
@ $131.34 · 2024-11-15
KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
Chief Operating Officer
$142,024
@ $135.39 · 2024-11-13
JENNY CHRISTOPHER T
Director
$1.14M
@ $135.53 · 2024-11-12
QUEENAN DANIEL G
Officer
$1.15M
@ $114.67 · 2024-09-03
JENNY CHRISTOPHER T
Director
$1.21M
@ $112.00 · 2024-08-20
KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
Chief Operating Officer
$116,948
@ $108.89 · 2024-08-12
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$360,535
@ $108.89 · 2024-08-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CBRE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
CBRE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView CBRE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ABBV vs CBRE

Is AbbVie Inc. or CBRE Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CBRE trades at a 5.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $155 vs. price $147), compared to ABBV's -40.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $178 vs. $251).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, AbbVie Inc. or CBRE Group, Inc.?

ABBV scores 82/100 (Wide moat), while CBRE scores 55/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is AbbVie Inc. in financial distress?

ABBV's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CBRE scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AbbVie Inc. or CBRE Group, Inc.?

ABBV earns 27.6% ROIC versus CBRE's 6.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.