Compare StocksABBV vs CARR

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs Carrier Global Corporation (CARR)

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$206.60
VS
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
$67.62

Rewards

ABBV
  • AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 72.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • AbbVie Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
CARR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

ABBV
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Trailing P/E of 100.8x is 61% above the historical average of 62.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
CARR
  • Trailing P/E of 45.1x is 108% above the historical average of 21.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
CARR
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.12B
N/A
FCF Yield
3.78%
100.78
Trailing P/E
45.08
12.77
Forward P/E
21.16
Quality & Moat
22.90%
ROIC
4.31%
N/A
ROE
10.75%
72.03%
Gross Margin
25.18%
0.57
PEG Ratio
1.62
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
0.91
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.57
3.35%
Dividend Yield
1.42%
ABBV: 6Ties: 1CARR: 1
ABBVCARR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

CARR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CARR
$1.53
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.38B
Δ Market Cap
+$9.75B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
481.9% Overvalued
Price is 481.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $206.60
Fair Value: $35.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CARR
51.9% Overvalued
Price is 51.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $67.62
Fair Value: $44.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

CARR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $68?

+18.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.0%

The market implies +18.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CARR
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CARR
-2.56
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.5%Retail & Other 23.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,052
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CARR
Insiders 6.2%Institutions 90.8%Retail & Other 3.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,973
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CARR
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.02M
GITLIN DAVID L
Chief Executive Officer
$1.02M
@ $52.62 · 2025-11-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CARR
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
CROCKETT KYLE
Officer
$1.23M
@ $65.18 · 2025-02-14
CROCKETT KYLE
Officer
$889,082
@ $76.34 · 2024-11-07
O'CONNOR KEVIN J
Officer
$12.28M
@ $73.46 · 2024-11-06
AGRAWAL AJAY
Officer
$4.03M
@ $64.55 · 2024-08-08
CROCKETT KYLE
Officer
$306,134
@ $66.39 · 2024-05-21
O'CONNOR KEVIN J
Officer
$1.31M
@ $65.73 · 2024-05-16
VILLENEUVE NADIA
Officer
$6.44M
@ $65.40 · 2024-05-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CARR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
CARR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView CARR Full Analysis
ABBV vs CARR: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io