Compare StocksABBV vs BBY

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs Best Buy Co., Inc. (BBY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ABBV is overvalued at $251, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -41%. BBY is undervalued at $86, with an intrinsic value of $23964049260 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, BBY has the wider margin of safety.

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$250.94
VS
BBY
Best Buy Co., Inc.
$86.26

Rewards

ABBV
  • AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 72.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • AbbVie Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
BBY
  • Best Buy Co., Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Best Buy Co., Inc. scores 87/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 12.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

ABBV
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
BBY
  • Gross margin of 22.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • 9 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ABBV
BBY
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.14B
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
70.89
Trailing P/E
15.97
15.41
Forward P/E
12.18
Quality & Moat
27.60%
ROIC
18.51%
N/A
ROE
39.10%
72.79%
Gross Margin
22.52%
0.41
PEG Ratio
1.64
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.72
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.85
2.76%
Dividend Yield
4.45%
ABBV: 3Ties: 1BBY: 4
ABBVBBY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ABBV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BBY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ABBV
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-19.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$118.02B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BBY
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$828.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$7.98
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ABBV
40.7% Overvalued
Price is 40.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $250.94
Fair Value: $178.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BBY
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $86.26
Fair Value: $23964049260.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ABBV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

BBY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $86?

-30.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -29.2%

The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -29.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ABBV
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BBY
87/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ABBV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BBY
-2.84
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ABBV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,146
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BBY
Insiders 6.5%Institutions 99.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,269
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BBY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BARRY CORIE S
Chief Executive Officer
$984,420
@ $72.92 · 2025-03-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ABBV
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BBY
1
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.51M
WATSON MATHEW
Officer
$131,659
@ $73.80 · 2026-05-29
BONFIG JASON J
Officer
$405,624
@ $64.02 · 2026-03-23
HARTMAN TODD G.
General Counsel
$341,797
@ $64.02 · 2026-03-23
BILUNAS MATTHEW M.
Chief Financial Officer
$727,000
@ $64.02 · 2026-03-23
SCARLETT KATHLEEN
Officer
$515,289
@ $64.02 · 2026-03-23
WATSON MATHEW
Officer
$211,135
@ $64.02 · 2026-03-23
BARRY CORIE S
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $64.02 · 2026-03-23
WATSON MATHEW
Officer
$154,908
@ $76.76 · 2025-09-04
WATSON MATHEW
Officer
$275,176
@ $74.07 · 2025-08-29
BILUNAS MATTHEW M.
Chief Financial Officer
$4.47M
@ $73.96 · 2025-03-24
HARMON DAMIEN D
Officer
$294,002
@ $72.65 · 2025-03-21
BONFIG JASON J
Officer
$353,573
@ $72.65 · 2025-03-21
HARTMAN TODD G.
General Counsel
$355,462
@ $72.65 · 2025-03-21
SCARLETT KATHLEEN
Officer
$497,414
@ $72.65 · 2025-03-21
WATSON MATHEW
Officer
$214,381
@ $72.65 · 2025-03-21
WATSON MATHEW
Officer
$226,837
@ $71.29 · 2025-03-14
BILUNAS MATTHEW M.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.05M
@ $87.46 · 2024-12-11
BARRY CORIE S
Chief Executive Officer
$7.72M
@ $96.66 · 2024-09-11
SCARLETT KATHLEEN
Officer
$4.00M
@ $99.60 · 2024-08-30
BONFIG JASON J
Officer
$2.52M
@ $101.00 · 2024-08-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ABBV
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BBY
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ABBV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
BBY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View ABBV Full AnalysisView BBY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ABBV vs BBY

Is AbbVie Inc. or Best Buy Co., Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BBY trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $23964049260 vs. price $86), compared to ABBV's -40.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $178 vs. $251).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, AbbVie Inc. or Best Buy Co., Inc.?

BBY scores 87/100 (Wide moat), while ABBV scores 82/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is AbbVie Inc. in financial distress?

ABBV's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BBY scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AbbVie Inc. or Best Buy Co., Inc.?

ABBV earns 27.6% ROIC versus BBY's 18.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, AbbVie Inc.'s or Best Buy Co., Inc.'s?

BBY's dividend earns a safety score of 60/100 (Safe), compared to ABBV's 39/100 (Unsafe). BBY has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.