Compare StocksAAPL vs PLD

Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs Prologis, Inc. (PLD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AAPL is overvalued at $298, with a DCF intrinsic value of $182 and a margin of safety of -64%. PLD is overvalued at $141, with an intrinsic value of $92 and a margin of safety of -52%. Of the two, PLD has the wider margin of safety.

AAPL
Apple Inc.
$298.01
VS
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
$140.54

Rewards

AAPL
  • Apple Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Apple Inc. scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
PLD
  • Gross margin of 75.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

AAPL
  • FCF yield of 2.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 2.42 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $111.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
PLD
  • PEG ratio of 113.67 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AAPL
PLD
Valuation
$101.09B
Free Cash Flow
$4.85B
2.31%
FCF Yield
3.69%
36.08
Trailing P/E
35.40
31.06
Forward P/E
41.86
Quality & Moat
60.20%
ROIC
3.06%
141.47%
ROE
6.84%
47.86%
Gross Margin
75.60%
2.42
PEG Ratio
113.67
Balance Sheet Safety
0.15
Net Debt / Equity
0.59
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.25
0.36%
Dividend Yield
2.91%
AAPL: 7Ties: 2PLD: 3
AAPLPLD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AAPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PLD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AAPL
$7.57
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$257.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.94T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PLD
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-444.7M
Δ Market Cap
+$14.55B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AAPL
63.8% Overvalued
Price is 63.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $298.01
Fair Value: $181.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PLD
52.3% Overvalued
Price is 52.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $140.54
Fair Value: $92.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AAPL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $298?

+16.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.3%

The market implies +16.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PLD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $141?

+20.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%

The market implies +20.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AAPL
96/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PLD
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AAPL
-2.29
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PLD
-2.19
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AAPL
Insiders 1.6%Institutions 65.8%Retail & Other 32.5%
No. of Institutional Holders7,675
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PLD
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 98.1%Retail & Other 1.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,288
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AAPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PLD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
SLUSSER SARAH ANN
Director
$1,395
@ $107.31 · 2025-05-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AAPL
6
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $198.97M
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$15.55M
@ $311.02 · 2026-05-27
BORDERS BEN
Officer
$369,460
@ $290.00 · 2026-05-08
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$71.19M
@ $284.76 · 2026-05-06
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$421,850
@ $275.00 · 2026-04-23
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$16.51M
@ $254.23 · 2026-04-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$7.66M
@ $255.35 · 2026-04-02
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.02M
@ $271.23 · 2025-11-07
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.04M
@ $247.39 · 2025-10-16
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$12.10M
@ $256.79 · 2025-10-02
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$33.38M
@ $256.81 · 2025-10-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$11.07M
@ $257.39 · 2025-10-02
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$20.89M
@ $232.07 · 2025-08-28
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$7.77M
@ $223.20 · 2025-08-08
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$933,955
@ $208.19 · 2025-05-12
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$941,420
@ $206.00 · 2025-04-23
WILLIAMS JEFFREY E
Chief Operating Officer
$7.95M
@ $224.01 · 2025-04-02
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$8.68M
@ $223.67 · 2025-04-02
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$24.18M
@ $223.65 · 2025-04-02
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$343,147
@ $226.35 · 2025-02-03
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$45.46M
@ $227.32 · 2024-11-19
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$945,233
@ $228.87 · 2024-11-18
MAESTRI LUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$13.43M
@ $226.52 · 2024-10-04
WILLIAMS JEFFREY E
Chief Operating Officer
$13.55M
@ $226.86 · 2024-10-02
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$13.80M
@ $226.20 · 2024-10-02
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$50.28M
@ $224.46 · 2024-10-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$13.84M
@ $226.87 · 2024-10-02
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.96M
@ $225.00 · 2024-08-15
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.12M
@ $216.50 · 2024-08-09
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$20.64M
@ $206.44 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PLD
0
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $13.23M
SLUSSER SARAH ANN
Director
$12,631
@ $113.79 · 2026-01-28
BITA CRISTINA GABRIELA
Director
$79,240
@ $127.60 · 2025-12-01
BITA CRISTINA GABRIELA
Director
$61,570
@ $123.14 · 2025-11-03
CONNOR JAMES B
Director
$10.13M
@ $126.58 · 2025-10-24
BITA CRISTINA GABRIELA
Director
$57,845
@ $115.69 · 2025-10-01
BITA CRISTINA GABRIELA
Director
$111,000
@ $111.00 · 2025-09-03
PALAZZOLO LORI A
Officer
$2.78M
@ $111.33 · 2025-08-26
GHAZAL JOSEPH
Chief Investment Officer
$1.31M
@ $118.74 · 2025-02-05
GHAZAL JOSEPH
Chief Investment Officer
$671,164
@ $129.07 · 2024-08-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AAPL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PLD
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AAPL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
PLD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View AAPL Full AnalysisView PLD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AAPL vs PLD

Is Apple Inc. or Prologis, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PLD trades at a -52.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $92 vs. price $141), compared to AAPL's -63.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $182 vs. $298).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Apple Inc. or Prologis, Inc.?

AAPL scores 96/100 (Wide moat), while PLD scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Prologis, Inc. in financial distress?

PLD's Altman Z-Score of 1.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AAPL scores 10.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Apple Inc. or Prologis, Inc.?

Prologis, Inc. (PLD) generates a 3.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Apple Inc.'s 2.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Apple Inc. or Prologis, Inc.?

AAPL earns 60.2% ROIC versus PLD's 3.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Apple Inc.'s or Prologis, Inc.'s?

AAPL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to PLD's 39/100 (Unsafe). AAPL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.