Compare StocksAAPL vs ETR

Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs Entergy Corporation (ETR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AAPL is overvalued at $298, with a DCF intrinsic value of $182 and a margin of safety of -64%. ETR is overvalued at $111, with an intrinsic value of $61 and a margin of safety of -83%. Of the two, AAPL has the wider margin of safety.

AAPL
Apple Inc.
$298.01
VS
ETR
Entergy Corporation
$111.11

Rewards

AAPL
  • Apple Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Apple Inc. scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
ETR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.47 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AAPL
  • FCF yield of 2.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 2.42 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $111.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
ETR
  • Entergy Corporation scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Trailing P/E of 28.3x is 35% above the historical average of 21.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.22 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AAPL
ETR
Valuation
$101.09B
Free Cash Flow
$-3.91B
2.31%
FCF Yield
-7.69%
36.08
Trailing P/E
28.34
31.06
Forward P/E
21.95
Quality & Moat
60.20%
ROIC
3.79%
141.47%
ROE
10.75%
47.86%
Gross Margin
46.98%
2.42
PEG Ratio
2.22
Balance Sheet Safety
0.15
Net Debt / Equity
1.73
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.55
0.36%
Dividend Yield
2.24%
AAPL: 6Ties: 2ETR: 4
AAPLETR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AAPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ETR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AAPL
$7.57
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$257.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.94T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ETR
$8.33
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.17B
Δ Market Cap
+$18.05B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AAPL
63.8% Overvalued
Price is 63.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $298.01
Fair Value: $181.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ETR
83.0% Overvalued
Price is 83.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $111.11
Fair Value: $60.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AAPL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $298?

+16.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.3%

The market implies +16.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ETR

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AAPL
96/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
ETR
27/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AAPL
-2.29
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ETR
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AAPL
Insiders 1.6%Institutions 65.8%Retail & Other 32.5%
No. of Institutional Holders7,675
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ETR
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 97.9%Retail & Other 1.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,696
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AAPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ETR
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $96,690
ROPP RALPH LEWIS
Director
$96,690
@ $96.69 · 2025-11-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AAPL
6
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $198.97M
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$15.55M
@ $311.02 · 2026-05-27
BORDERS BEN
Officer
$369,460
@ $290.00 · 2026-05-08
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$71.19M
@ $284.76 · 2026-05-06
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$421,850
@ $275.00 · 2026-04-23
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$16.51M
@ $254.23 · 2026-04-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$7.66M
@ $255.35 · 2026-04-02
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.02M
@ $271.23 · 2025-11-07
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.04M
@ $247.39 · 2025-10-16
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$12.10M
@ $256.79 · 2025-10-02
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$33.38M
@ $256.81 · 2025-10-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$11.07M
@ $257.39 · 2025-10-02
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$20.89M
@ $232.07 · 2025-08-28
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$7.77M
@ $223.20 · 2025-08-08
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$933,955
@ $208.19 · 2025-05-12
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$941,420
@ $206.00 · 2025-04-23
WILLIAMS JEFFREY E
Chief Operating Officer
$7.95M
@ $224.01 · 2025-04-02
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$8.68M
@ $223.67 · 2025-04-02
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$24.18M
@ $223.65 · 2025-04-02
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$343,147
@ $226.35 · 2025-02-03
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$45.46M
@ $227.32 · 2024-11-19
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$945,233
@ $228.87 · 2024-11-18
MAESTRI LUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$13.43M
@ $226.52 · 2024-10-04
WILLIAMS JEFFREY E
Chief Operating Officer
$13.55M
@ $226.86 · 2024-10-02
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$13.80M
@ $226.20 · 2024-10-02
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$50.28M
@ $224.46 · 2024-10-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$13.84M
@ $226.87 · 2024-10-02
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.96M
@ $225.00 · 2024-08-15
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.12M
@ $216.50 · 2024-08-09
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$20.64M
@ $206.44 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ETR
1
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.23M
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$1.17M
@ $110.00 · 2026-06-03
HUDSON JOHN O. III
Officer
$1.05M
@ $104.79 · 2026-02-23
DINELLI JOHN C
Officer
$558,419
@ $103.95 · 2026-02-20
CHAPMAN JASON
Chief Technology Officer
$1.79M
@ $104.02 · 2026-02-13
BROWN MARCUS V
Officer
$2.25M
@ $105.12 · 2026-02-13
LANDREAUX LAURA R
Officer
$234,150
@ $93.66 · 2025-11-21
MINOR ANASTASIA
Officer
$481,950
@ $96.39 · 2025-11-04
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$495,624
@ $96.50 · 2025-11-04
CHAPMAN JASON
Officer
$483,050
@ $96.61 · 2025-11-03
ELLIS BRIAN W
Director
$4,133
@ $96.12 · 2025-10-31
CHAPMAN JASON
Chief Technology Officer
$727,426
@ $96.45 · 2025-10-30
MINOR ANASTASIA
Officer
$13,195
@ $91.00 · 2025-08-13
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$403,902
@ $90.50 · 2025-07-31
COOK-NELSON KIMBERLY
Chief Operating Officer
$1.91M
@ $90.20 · 2025-07-30
COOK-NELSON KIMBERLY
Chief Operating Officer
$660,000
@ $88.00 · 2025-07-22
ELLIS BRIAN W
Director
$53,261
@ $82.32 · 2025-05-30
FONTAN KIMBERLY A.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.29M
@ $81.95 · 2025-05-29
RODRIGUEZ DEANNA D
Officer
$266,101
@ $82.64 · 2025-03-06
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$1.56M
@ $87.34 · 2025-03-04
NORGEOT PETER S JR
Chief Operating Officer
$1.68M
@ $86.78 · 2025-02-28
MINOR ANASTASIA
Officer
$1.06M
@ $85.36 · 2025-02-25
CHAPMAN JASON
Officer
$294,645
@ $85.01 · 2025-02-24
MAY PHILLIP R JR
Officer
$3.00M
@ $85.28 · 2025-02-21
VIAMONTES ELIECER
Officer
$1.81M
@ $85.62 · 2025-02-20
BROWN MARCUS V
General Counsel
$13.73M
@ $87.06 · 2025-02-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AAPL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ETR
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AAPL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
ETR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View AAPL Full AnalysisView ETR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AAPL vs ETR

Is Apple Inc. or Entergy Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AAPL trades at a -63.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $182 vs. price $298), compared to ETR's -83.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $61 vs. $111).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Apple Inc. or Entergy Corporation?

AAPL scores 96/100 (Wide moat), while ETR scores 27/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Entergy Corporation in financial distress?

ETR's Altman Z-Score of 1.0 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AAPL scores 10.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Apple Inc. or Entergy Corporation?

Apple Inc. (AAPL) generates a 2.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Entergy Corporation's -7.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Apple Inc. or Entergy Corporation?

AAPL earns 60.2% ROIC versus ETR's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Apple Inc.'s or Entergy Corporation's?

AAPL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ETR's 69/100 (Safe). AAPL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

AAPL vs ETR: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io