Compare Stocks › AAPL vs BMY

Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AAPL is overvalued at $345, with a DCF intrinsic value of $166 and a margin of safety of -107%. BMY is fairly valued at $62, with an intrinsic value of $64 and a margin of safety of 3%. Of the two, BMY has the wider margin of safety.

AAPL
Apple Inc.
$344.63
VS
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
$62.48

Rewards

AAPL
  • ★Apple Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Apple Inc. scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
BMY
  • ★Gross margin of 70.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★FCF yield of 10.1% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 13.9x is 22% below the historical average of 17.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

AAPL
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.76 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠15 insider sales totaling $94.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
BMY
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 17.32 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AAPL
BMY
Valuation
$107.72B
Free Cash Flow
$12.85B
2.14%
FCF Yield
10.06%
39.52
Trailing P/E
13.85
36.07
Forward P/E
9.40
Quality & Moat
62.71%
ROIC
19.58%
148.75%
ROE
44.01%
48.65%
Gross Margin
70.50%
2.76
PEG Ratio
17.32
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Net Debt / Equity
1.38
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.13
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.77
0.31%
Dividend Yield
4.03%
AAPL: 6Ties: 1BMY: 5
AAPLBMY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AAPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BMY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AAPL
$7.57
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$257.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.94T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BMY
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-8.52B
Δ Market Cap
$-39.49B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AAPL
107.0% Overvalued
Price is 107.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $344.63
Fair Value: $166.47
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BMY
2.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 2.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $62.48
Fair Value: $64.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AAPL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $345?

+18.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.3%

The market implies +18.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +19.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BMY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $62?

+5.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.2%

The market implies +5.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AAPL
96/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BMY
60/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AAPL
-2.29
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BMY
-2.71
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AAPL
Insiders 1.6%Institutions 66.4%Retail & Other 32.0%
No. of Institutional Holders7,724
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BMY
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,307
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AAPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BMY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HIRAWAT SAMIT
Officer
$202,215
@ $47.58 · 2025-04-25
BOERNER CHRISTOPHER S
Chief Executive Officer
$110,096
@ $55.05 · 2025-02-20
HIRAWAT SAMIT
Officer
$100,000
@ $54.85 · 2025-02-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AAPL
15
Sells (3M)
23
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $207.41M
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$814,748
@ $339.62 · 2026-10-20
BORDERS BEN
Officer
$442,108
@ $345.40 · 2026-10-16
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$480,315
@ $345.05 · 2026-10-16
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$796,492
@ $332.01 · 2026-10-06
COOK TIMOTHY D
Officer and Director
$63.85M
@ $332.96 · 2026-10-02
TERNUS JOHN
Chief Executive Officer
$8.46M
@ $332.94 · 2026-10-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$15.47M
@ $333.42 · 2026-10-02
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$806,496
@ $336.18 · 2026-09-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$815,804
@ $340.06 · 2026-09-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$474,813
@ $330.19 · 2026-09-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$456,177
@ $317.23 · 2026-09-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$456,177
@ $317.01 · 2026-09-01
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$447,457
@ $310.95 · 2026-08-25
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$442,478
@ $307.49 · 2026-08-18
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$442,852
@ $307.75 · 2026-08-11
BORDERS BEN
Officer
$34,236
@ $295.14 · 2026-06-16
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$15.55M
@ $311.02 · 2026-05-27
BORDERS BEN
Officer
$369,460
@ $290.00 · 2026-05-08
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$71.19M
@ $284.76 · 2026-05-06
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$421,850
@ $275.00 · 2026-04-23
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$16.51M
@ $254.23 · 2026-04-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$7.66M
@ $255.35 · 2026-04-02
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.02M
@ $271.23 · 2025-11-07
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.04M
@ $247.39 · 2025-10-16
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$33.38M
@ $256.81 · 2025-10-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$11.07M
@ $257.39 · 2025-10-02
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$12.10M
@ $256.79 · 2025-10-02
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$20.89M
@ $232.07 · 2025-08-28
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$7.77M
@ $223.20 · 2025-08-08
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$933,955
@ $208.19 · 2025-05-12
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$941,420
@ $206.00 · 2025-04-23
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$24.18M
@ $223.65 · 2025-04-02
WILLIAMS JEFFREY E
Chief Operating Officer
$7.95M
@ $224.01 · 2025-04-02
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$8.68M
@ $223.67 · 2025-04-02
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$343,147
@ $226.35 · 2025-02-03
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$45.46M
@ $227.32 · 2024-11-19
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$945,233
@ $228.87 · 2024-11-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BMY
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.29M
MASSACESI CRISTIAN
Officer
$403,498
@ $64.57 · 2026-09-09
HOLZER PHIL M
Officer
$33,750
@ $67.50 · 2026-08-25
ELKINS DAVID VINCENT
Chief Financial Officer
$1.85M
@ $61.67 · 2026-04-01
ELKINS DAVID VINCENT
Chief Financial Officer
$2.65M
@ $47.33 · 2025-09-02
SHORT BARTIE WENDY
Officer
$16,719
@ $44.23 · 2025-08-01
HOLZER PHIL M
Officer
$38,930
@ $55.61 · 2024-11-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AAPL
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BMY
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AAPL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
BMY
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View AAPL Full AnalysisView BMY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AAPL vs BMY

Is Apple Inc. or Bristol-Myers Squibb Company more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BMY trades at a 2.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $64 vs. price $62), compared to AAPL's -107.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $166 vs. $345).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Apple Inc. or Bristol-Myers Squibb Company?▼

AAPL scores 96/100 (Wide moat), while BMY scores 60/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bristol-Myers Squibb Company in financial distress?▼

BMY's Altman Z-Score of 2.3 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AAPL scores 10.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Apple Inc. or Bristol-Myers Squibb Company?▼

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) generates a 10.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Apple Inc.'s 2.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Apple Inc. or Bristol-Myers Squibb Company?▼

AAPL earns 62.7% ROIC versus BMY's 19.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Apple Inc.'s or Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's?▼

AAPL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BMY's 84/100 (Very Safe). AAPL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

AAPL vs BMY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io