Compare Stocks › AAPL vs BLK

Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs BlackRock, Inc. (BLK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AAPL is overvalued at $345, with a DCF intrinsic value of $166 and a margin of safety of -107%. BLK is fairly valued at $1148, with an intrinsic value of $1065 and a margin of safety of -8%. Of the two, BLK has the wider margin of safety.

AAPL
Apple Inc.
$344.63
VS
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
$1147.54

Rewards

AAPL
  • ★Apple Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Apple Inc. scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
BLK
  • ★BlackRock, Inc. scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.58 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.95 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

AAPL
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.76 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠15 insider sales totaling $94.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
BLK
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 1.71 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠10 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 7.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AAPL
BLK
Valuation
$107.72B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
2.14%
FCF Yield
N/A
39.52
Trailing P/E
26.13
36.07
Forward P/E
17.70
Quality & Moat
62.71%
ROIC
10.75%
148.75%
ROE
8.60%
48.65%
Gross Margin
48.28%
2.76
PEG Ratio
0.95
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Net Debt / Equity
0.02
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.13
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.09
0.31%
Dividend Yield
2.00%
AAPL: 2Ties: 2BLK: 6
AAPLBLK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AAPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BLK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AAPL
$7.57
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$257.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.94T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BLK
$7.54
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.94B
Δ Market Cap
+$59.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AAPL
107.0% Overvalued
Price is 107.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $344.63
Fair Value: $166.47
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BLK
7.7% Overvalued
Price is 7.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $1147.54
Fair Value: $1065.47
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AAPL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $345?

+18.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.3%

The market implies +18.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +19.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BLK

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AAPL
96/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BLK
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AAPL
-2.29
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BLK
-2.22
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AAPL
Insiders 1.6%Institutions 66.4%Retail & Other 32.0%
No. of Institutional Holders7,724
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BLK
Insiders 1.9%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 13.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,085
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AAPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BLK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AAPL
15
Sells (3M)
23
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $207.41M
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$814,748
@ $339.62 · 2026-10-20
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$480,315
@ $345.05 · 2026-10-16
BORDERS BEN
Officer
$442,108
@ $345.40 · 2026-10-16
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$796,492
@ $332.01 · 2026-10-06
COOK TIMOTHY D
Officer and Director
$63.85M
@ $332.96 · 2026-10-02
TERNUS JOHN
Chief Executive Officer
$8.46M
@ $332.94 · 2026-10-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$15.47M
@ $333.42 · 2026-10-02
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$806,496
@ $336.18 · 2026-09-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$815,804
@ $340.06 · 2026-09-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$474,813
@ $330.19 · 2026-09-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$456,177
@ $317.23 · 2026-09-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$456,177
@ $317.01 · 2026-09-01
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$447,457
@ $310.95 · 2026-08-25
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$442,478
@ $307.49 · 2026-08-18
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
General Counsel
$442,852
@ $307.75 · 2026-08-11
BORDERS BEN
Officer
$34,236
@ $295.14 · 2026-06-16
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$15.55M
@ $311.02 · 2026-05-27
BORDERS BEN
Officer
$369,460
@ $290.00 · 2026-05-08
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$71.19M
@ $284.76 · 2026-05-06
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$421,850
@ $275.00 · 2026-04-23
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$16.51M
@ $254.23 · 2026-04-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$7.66M
@ $255.35 · 2026-04-02
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.02M
@ $271.23 · 2025-11-07
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.04M
@ $247.39 · 2025-10-16
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$33.38M
@ $256.81 · 2025-10-02
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$11.07M
@ $257.39 · 2025-10-02
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$12.10M
@ $256.79 · 2025-10-02
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$20.89M
@ $232.07 · 2025-08-28
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE
Officer
$7.77M
@ $223.20 · 2025-08-08
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$933,955
@ $208.19 · 2025-05-12
PAREKH KEVAN
Chief Financial Officer
$941,420
@ $206.00 · 2025-04-23
COOK TIMOTHY D
Chief Executive Officer
$24.18M
@ $223.65 · 2025-04-02
WILLIAMS JEFFREY E
Chief Operating Officer
$7.95M
@ $224.01 · 2025-04-02
ADAMS KATHERINE L
General Counsel
$8.68M
@ $223.67 · 2025-04-02
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$343,147
@ $226.35 · 2025-02-03
LEVINSON ARTHUR D
Director
$45.46M
@ $227.32 · 2024-11-19
KONDO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$945,233
@ $228.87 · 2024-11-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BLK
0
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $189.58M
MEADE CHRISTOPHER J
General Counsel
$19.94M
@ $1102.09 · 2026-07-16
FINK LAURENCE D
Chief Executive Officer
$2.06M
@ $1080.57 · 2026-07-16
FINK LAURENCE D
Chief Executive Officer
$35.61M
@ $1050.55 · 2026-04-28
KAPITO ROBERT S
President
$9.23M
@ $1056.60 · 2026-04-27
COHEN STEPHEN
Officer
$240,651
@ $1069.56 · 2026-02-23
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT L
Chief Operating Officer
$64.66M
@ $1087.02 · 2026-02-11
COHEN STEPHEN
Officer
$2.34M
@ $1073.87 · 2026-02-11
KUSHEL J RICHARD
Officer
$22.50M
@ $1125.00 · 2026-01-21
SMALL MARTIN
Chief Financial Officer
$31.68M
@ $1171.14 · 2026-01-16
SMALL MARTIN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.31M
@ $1043.38 · 2025-12-01
LORD RACHEL
Officer
$13.98M
@ $1165.04 · 2025-10-20
KUSHEL J RICHARD
Officer
$19.21M
@ $1120.50 · 2025-07-30
LORD RACHEL
Officer
$20.30M
@ $1125.60 · 2025-07-25
FINK LAURENCE D
Chief Executive Officer
$30.21M
@ $1123.69 · 2025-07-25
FREDA FABRIZIO
Director
$4.98M
@ $1122.81 · 2025-07-24
FINK LAURENCE D
Chief Executive Officer
$15.12M
@ $917.18 · 2025-04-29
KUSHEL J RICHARD
Officer
$9.13M
@ $912.50 · 2025-04-24
KUSHEL J RICHARD
Officer
$1.70M
@ $852.01 · 2025-04-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AAPL
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BLK
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AAPL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
BLK
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View AAPL Full AnalysisView BLK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AAPL vs BLK

Is Apple Inc. or BlackRock, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BLK trades at a -7.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1065 vs. price $1148), compared to AAPL's -107.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $166 vs. $345).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Apple Inc. or BlackRock, Inc.?▼

AAPL scores 96/100 (Wide moat), while BLK scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is BlackRock, Inc. in financial distress?▼

BLK's Altman Z-Score of 1.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AAPL scores 10.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Apple Inc. or BlackRock, Inc.?▼

AAPL earns 62.7% ROIC versus BLK's 10.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Apple Inc.'s or BlackRock, Inc.'s?▼

AAPL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BLK's 48/100 (Borderline). AAPL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

AAPL vs BLK: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io